Operations

2/14/2018
12:30 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cybercrime Costs for Financial Sector up 40% Since 2014

A 9.6% increase just in the past year, and denial-of-service attacks are partly to blame.

Financial services companies spend more on cyber incident response, on average, than any other industry, and the amount they spend per incident has swelled by 40% over the past three years, according to a new study. 

The Cost of Cybercrime Study, released Tuesday by Accenture and the Ponemon Institute, focuses on direct costs of incident response, not long-term remediation. According to the report, the finance sector's average per incident cost increased from $12.97 million in 2014 to $18.28 million in 2017; well above the 2017 average of all other industries at $11.7 million.

Nevertheless, the financial services industry continues to lead the way when it comes to their cybersecurity programs.          

"While the cost of cybercrime for financial services companies continues to rise, our research found that these companies have considerably more balanced and appropriate spending levels on key security technologies to combat sophisticated attacks than do those in other industries," Chris Thompson, a senior managing director at Accenture, said in a statement. "This is particularly true with regard to the use of automation, artificial intelligence and machine-learning technologies, which could be critical to future cybersecurity efforts."

In fact, the types of attacks that caused the financial services industry the most trouble were those that are as yet difficult to solve with technology, or have recently made advances in sophistication. While malware attacks were among the least costly for financial services at $5.46 million per incident on average, malicious insiders cost $169 million, phishing/social engineering cost $196.6 million, and denial-of-service attacks $227.7 million.

For more information, see here

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
12 Free, Ready-to-Use Security Tools
Steve Zurier, Freelance Writer,  10/12/2018
Most IT Security Pros Want to Change Jobs
Dark Reading Staff 10/12/2018
Most Malware Arrives Via Email
Dark Reading Staff 10/11/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-15378
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-15
A vulnerability in ClamAV versions prior to 0.100.2 could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to an error related to the MEW unpacker within the “unmew11()?? function (libclamav/mew.c), which can be exploited to trigger an inval...
CVE-2018-18073
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-15
Artifex Ghostscript allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism by leveraging exposure of system operators in the saved execution stack in an error object.
CVE-2018-15593
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-15
An issue was discovered in Ivanti Workspace Control before 10.3.10.0 and RES One Workspace. A local authenticated user can decrypt the encrypted datastore or relay server password by leveraging an unspecified attack vector.
CVE-2018-17961
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-15
Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving errorhandler setup. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-17183.
CVE-2018-15591
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-15
An issue was discovered in Ivanti Workspace Control before 10.3.10.0 and RES One Workspace. A local authenticated user can bypass Application Whitelisting restrictions to execute arbitrary code by leveraging multiple unspecified attack vectors.