Operations

6/1/2015
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Board Rooms Becoming More Security-Savvy

Thirty-five percent say they discuss cybersecurity at every board meeting, a Veracode-NYSE survey says.

Board rooms are becoming more sophisticated about cybersecurity, creating new opportunities for CISOs to lead, according to a recent survey of 200 directors of public companies, conducted by NYSE Governance Services and Veracode.

The unfortunate news is that 66 percent of survey respondents are "less than confident" that their companies are properly secured against cyberattacks. The good news, though, is that these directors seem to be taking action.

Over 80 percent of respondents said that cybersecurity is frequently discusssed at board meetings -- 46 percent said "most meetings," and 35 percent said "every meeting."

"Hopefully the other 20 percent will read this report and say 'we're being negligent,'" says Chris Wysopal, CTO and CISO of Veracode.

They're also elevating responsibility for security -- so that the security officer is no longer the scapegoat. When asked who is held accountable for a data breach, respondents' number one answer was CEO; that was followed, in descending order, by CIO, entire executive team, CISO, and board members.

Over 70 percent of repondents are significantly concerned about the risk of third-party software in their supply chains.

They're also shifting away from a compliance-focused approach to a more risk-based, strategic approach. Only 9 percent of respondents said they prefered CISOs to present cybersecurity information by "audit and compliance status," while 33 percent preferred "high-level security strategy descriptions" and 31 percent preferred "risk metrics."

"They're starting to think about the right issues," says Wysopal. "The place where we saw a bit of a disconnect was on brand damage. They didn't connect" brand damage with the security of the products and service their own company makes.

As he explains, respondents' number one fear regarding cyberattacks was "brand damage due to customer loss" -- moreso than costs of responding to incidents, corporate espionage, or compliance violations. Yet, Wysopal says organizations don't adequately consider the brand damage that could be done by putting a highly vulnerable or even malicious application on the market.

Respondents ranked security risks second to last in their list of concerns when introducing a new product or service to market, behind development costs, competitive differentiation, and revenue potential (but ahead of marketing costs).

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Technocrati
50%
50%
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
6/1/2015 | 7:38:24 PM
American Board Rooms: Add Security to the Docket
 I am really glad to hear this - no worry C-suits, there will still be enough time to talk about stock options, expense reimbursements and quarterly bonuses ....
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Mueller Probe Yields Hacking Indictments for 12 Russian Military Officers
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/13/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Hey, I don't make the rules: You get 3 virtual wishes.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The State of IT and Cybersecurity
The State of IT and Cybersecurity
IT and security are often viewed as different disciplines - and different departments. Find out what our survey data revealed, read the report today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14449
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An issue was discovered in libgig 4.1.0. There is an out of bounds read in gig::File::UpdateChunks in gig.cpp.
CVE-2018-14450
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An issue was discovered in libgig 4.1.0. There is an out-of-bounds read in the "update dimension region's chunks" feature of the function gig::Region::UpdateChunks in gig.cpp.
CVE-2018-14451
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An issue was discovered in libgig 4.1.0. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function RIFF::Chunk::Read in RIFF.cpp.
CVE-2018-14452
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An issue was discovered in libgig 4.1.0. There is an out-of-bounds read in the "always assign the sample of the first dimension region of this region" feature of the function gig::Region::UpdateChunks in gig.cpp.
CVE-2018-14453
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An issue was discovered in libgig 4.1.0. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in pData[1] access in the function store16 in helper.h.