Comments
Hacker Exploits 2-Year Old Router Issue To Steal Sensitive US Military Data
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/12/2018 | 8:32:36 AM
Re: Recalling Internet Census 2012 and Carna
All good points and add one more - the military complex generally (here we go) OUTSOURCES support to those wonderful firms such as Computer Sciences Corp (now CSRA for public accounts) and they are awful in every single way.  I know!  CSC destroyed Aon group after outsourced in 2004-2005 and to this day it is a horror.  Know nothing of security and their only concern per client is to GET PAID. 
No SOPA
50%
50%
No SOPA,
User Rank: Ninja
7/11/2018 | 8:03:44 PM
Recalling Internet Census 2012 and Carna
I don't know how many folks remember Carna and the paper published based on its Internet scanning findings "Internet Census 2012: Port scanning /0 using insecure embedded devices", but this article calls to mind some my more radical ideas about "getting there first". Breaches like this are painful because they feel so simple to have prevented in the first place.

Consider (putting aside whatever your ideas of privacy currently are) what happened here. As a result of 1) lack of implemented security standards for networked hardware configuration, 2) failure to upgrade networked hardware and/or firmware, 3) failure to properly secure sensitive documents and streaming data and 4) research on a publicly accessible search engine for networked devices, what can be considered a critical military breach occurred.

For those who recall Carna, an Internet "researcher" ran a bot that scanned for all intents and purposes the entire Internet, collecting over 9TB of data on connected devices, including those with open access due to poor configuration. Back in 2011/2012 almost anyone could do this; especially with search engines like Shodan online, literally anyone can do this. In many cases, exploits are a question of who "gets there first". With so much publicly accessible data on hackable systems attached to the Internet, how is it on a daily basis the "good guys" aren't "getting there first" and closing the holes?

As I said, putting aside all opinions on privacy, breaches like this happen for really basic and stupid reasons. But with those opinions set to the side, what's to say the military can't also be sitting in front of Shodan and looking for its own networked devices that are in danger of being compromised? Whats to say hardened versions of Carna can't be running out of financial institutions and monitored 24/7 to help them harden networks, or from military bases globally to keep the random laptops from popping up, maybe on a U.S. military base in Kandahar, that have holes ready to exploit?

I've always been a proponent of combative security, and it seems natural to suggest that as easy as this breach was to commit, it could have been just as easy to prevent with the right people on the other side of it looking for the same thing as the cybercriminals, but "getting there first" thanks to using the same techniques.

But of course, these techniques are not legal in most contexts (not sure if it's a crime to RSS Shodan data, but that alone isn't really sufficient to arm yourself and your network against potential intruders), so until we can iron out that detail we may continuing seeing these breaches happen due to painfully simple failures in security protocol and executed in painfully simple and publicly accessible methods.


Veterans Find New Roles in Enterprise Cybersecurity
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/12/2018
Understanding Evil Twin AP Attacks and How to Prevent Them
Ryan Orsi, Director of Product Management for Wi-Fi at WatchGuard Technologies,  11/14/2018
7 Free (or Cheap) Ways to Increase Your Cybersecurity Knowledge
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/15/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
Online Malware and Threats: A Profile of Today's Security Posture
This report offers insight on how security professionals plan to invest in cybersecurity, and how they are prioritizing their resources. Find out what your peers have planned today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18519
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-19
BestXsoftware Best Free Keylogger 5.2.9 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse "%PROGRAMFILES%\BFK 5.2.9\syscrb.exe" file because of insecure permissions for the BUILTIN\Users group.
CVE-2018-19355
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-19
modules/orderfiles/ajax/upload.php in the Customer Files Upload addon 2018-08-01 for PrestaShop (1.5 through 1.7) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by uploading a php file via modules/orderfiles/upload.php with auptype equal to product (for upload destinations under modules/productfi...
CVE-2008-7320
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
** DISPUTED ** GNOME Seahorse through 3.30 allows physically proximate attackers to read plaintext passwords by using the quickAllow dialog at an unattended workstation, if the keyring is unlocked. NOTE: this is disputed by a software maintainer because the behavior represents a design decision.
CVE-2018-19358
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
GNOME Keyring through 3.28.2 allows local users to retrieve login credentials via a Secret Service API call and the D-Bus interface if the keyring is unlocked, a similar issue to CVE-2008-7320. One perspective is that this occurs because available D-Bus protection mechanisms (involving the busconfig...
CVE-2018-19351
PUBLISHED: 2018-11-18
Jupyter Notebook before 5.7.1 allows XSS via an untrusted notebook because nbconvert responses are considered to have the same origin as the notebook server. In other words, nbconvert endpoints can execute JavaScript with access to the server API. In notebook/nbconvert/handlers.py, NbconvertFileHand...