Comments
What We Talk About When We Talk About Risk
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/11/2018 | 2:59:02 PM
Re: Cybersecurity Risk Taxonomy
Small Business - general rule is that a small business (I guess 50 emps or less) can live for only 2 weeks following a major crash of systems.  I supported such shops and always had a backup-restore plan in working place and used it on several critical cases inclusive of server drive failure and ransomware attack.   Measure THAT!!!   (Lesson - always ask for a large check for services in such cases).
jonesj26
50%
50%
jonesj26,
User Rank: Author
7/11/2018 | 1:44:13 PM
Re: Cybersecurity Risk Taxonomy
Thanks, Christian.  You're absolutely right about this problem being discussed for some time now.  Unfortunately, I don't believe it's broadly recognized yet as a foundational Achilles Heel for our profession.  Hopefully we can elevate it within the minds of our colleagues and accelerate the evolution of our profession.

Cheers

Jack
No SOPA
50%
50%
No SOPA,
User Rank: Ninja
7/11/2018 | 11:43:29 AM
Cybersecurity Risk Taxonomy
These are excellent points - in fact, the very list of risks you noted that are typically raised when asked are the ones I tend to see in initial project documents that relate to security.

Cybersecurity Risk Taxonomy (A. M. Rea-Guaman, T. San Feliu, J. A. Calvo-Manzano, I. D. Sanchez-Garcia) is a paper published under the International Conference on Software Process Improvement, 2017. It covers an interesting deep dive into studies published from 1990 to 2017. They found "132 papers and some of them mention some risk taxonomies within the scope of IT (information technologies) cybersecurity, although only five primary elements were selected, identifying the main risk taxonomies."

The perspectives covered include Asset, Attacks, Service, Business and External, with papers covering a wide range of combinations of taxonomy descriptions. Some of the items in the taxonomies include Business objects and dynamics models, Social engineering, Systems and technology failures, Failed internal processes, Resource or target information and Actions of people.

Your example InfoSec risks make sense upon more reading of studies like the one above, which is a great piece indicating this conversation of risk in InfoSec has been going on for some time.


WebAuthn, FIDO2 Infuse Browsers, Platforms with Strong Authentication
John Fontana, Standards & Identity Analyst, Yubico,  9/19/2018
Turn the NIST Cybersecurity Framework into Reality: 5 Steps
Mukul Kumar & Anupam Sahai, CISO & VP of Cyber Practice and VP Product Management, Cavirin Systems,  9/20/2018
NSS Labs Files Antitrust Suit Against Symantec, CrowdStrike, ESET, AMTSO
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: White Privelege Day
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-6504
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
A potential Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).
CVE-2018-6505
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
A potential Unauthenticated File Download vulnerability has been identified in ArcSight Management Center (ArcMC) in all versions prior to 2.81. This vulnerability could be exploited to allow for Unauthenticated File Downloads.
CVE-2018-14796
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Tec4Data SmartCooler, all versions prior to firmware 180806, the device responds to a remote unauthenticated reboot command that may be used to perform a denial of service attack.
CVE-2018-14821
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic Versions 4.00.01 and prior. This vulnerability may allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to intentionally send a malformed CIP packet to Port 44818, causing the RSLinx Classic application to terminate. The user will need to manually restart the software to r...
CVE-2018-14827
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-20
Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic Versions 4.00.01 and prior. A remote, unauthenticated threat actor may intentionally send specially crafted Ethernet/IP packets to Port 44818, causing the software application to stop responding and crash. The user must restart the software to regain functionality.