Comments
'Shift Left' & the Connected Car
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ThomasMaloney
50%
50%
ThomasMaloney,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/30/2018 | 1:40:43 AM
Re: Remove it entirely from cars
It is never a straightforward process that we could take a shortcut in when it concerns product developments. We need to ensure that every single step is carefully considered in order to achieve only the best results. Perhaps it is time that we try a new mean to improve our operations in order to still produce the best but at a shorter turnaround to be efficient from every single perspective.
Patrick Ciavolella
50%
50%
Patrick Ciavolella,
User Rank: Author
7/23/2018 | 8:34:30 AM
Remove it entirely from cars
Vulnerabilities are there not because they were not thuroughly thought out at the beginning but because it was not known at the time. Good guys cant spend the same amunt of time trying to break into items like the bad guys do. If we did we would live in a perfect world where there were no vulnerabilities. We all know this can never be the case, where there is a will there is a way, be it good or bad.
Only real solution is remove this data from cars entirely. It is not essential, people are just becoming lazier and reliant upon them to focus on the task at hand, Driving.
SchemaCzar
100%
0%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
6/13/2018 | 9:51:14 AM
Agile can't "Shift Left"Security has no "story points"
Security is something that simply cannot be addressed with Agile methodologies.  Security has no story points or other demo-able pieces that you can put at the end of a sprint, for example.  Security doesn't have the visibility needed for Agile's all-important feedback loop. Most importantly, security requires DESIGN.


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2016-10739
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.28, the getaddrinfo function would successfully parse a string that contained an IPv4 address followed by whitespace and arbitrary characters, which could lead applications to incorrectly assume that it had parsed a valid string, without the possib...
CVE-2019-6499
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
Teradata Viewpoint before 14.0 and 16.20.00.02-b80 contains a hardcoded password of TDv1i2e3w4 for the viewpoint database account (in viewpoint-portal\conf\server.xml) that could potentially be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system.
CVE-2019-6500
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
In Axway File Transfer Direct 2.7.1, an unauthenticated Directory Traversal vulnerability can be exploited by issuing a specially crafted HTTP GET request with %2e instead of '.' characters, as demonstrated by an initial /h2hdocumentation//%2e%2e/ substring.
CVE-2019-6498
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-21
GattLib 0.2 has a stack-based buffer over-read in gattlib_connect in dbus/gattlib.c because strncpy is misused.
CVE-2019-6497
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-20
Hotels_Server through 2018-11-05 has SQL Injection via the controller/fetchpwd.php username parameter.