Comments
Mueller May Indict Russians Who Hacked DNC
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sporter117
0%
100%
sporter117,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2018 | 4:55:34 PM
Re: Wrong collusion
Agreed...

Want to look like a russian, hack a russian computer then attack your target...

51% of attacks are insiders, so I have always felt Seth Rich was the likely suspect.

Especially since he was killed while being robbed, yet his wallet was left on him with cash in it.

 
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
3/5/2018 | 12:35:22 PM
Wrong collusion
Russian Hackers have done alot but they did not hack the DNC on first crack - that data breach was a (now dead) DNC staffer who handed Julian Assange a ton of information.  Physical transfer of data.  Hand to hand.  Assange has said so over and over and so far NOBODY HAS FOUND HIM WRONG.   They do not like his methods but he tells truth.  Personally I think of him as Ernst Stavro Blofeld --- all he needs is a Nehru jacket and a white cat.  Now the DNC was hacked in other areas later on.  Podesta and Madame Oven Mitt's famous server. 
SchemaCzar
0%
100%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
3/3/2018 | 3:35:21 PM
Since when are Russian hackers stupid enough to leak their own phishing emails?
Blaming the Russians for wikileaks is ridiculous.  Advanced cyber war teams for nation-states don't leave tracks.  Yes, Podesta was stupid enough to fall for a trivial phishing scam, but how stupid would it be to release the emails that included your own phishing breach?  Too stupid for Russians.

Wikileaks says it received the emails as a leak from someone authorized to see that information.  The emails were genuine. Why would Wikileaks jeopardize its own credibility by lying about its sources?


Higher Education: 15 Books to Help Cybersecurity Pros Be Better
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
Worst Password Blunders of 2018 Hit Organizations East and West
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
2019 Attacker Playbook
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  12/14/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
[Sponsored Content] The State of Encryption and How to Improve It
Encryption and access controls are considered to be the ultimate safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of data, which is why they're mandated in so many compliance and regulatory standards. While the cybersecurity market boasts a wide variety of encryption technologies, many data breaches reveal that sensitive and personal data has often been left unencrypted and, therefore, vulnerable.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-1265
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740.
CVE-2017-1272
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 stores sensitive information in URL parameters. This may lead to information disclosure if unauthorized parties have access to the URLs via server logs, referrer header or browser history. IBM X-Force ID: 124747. IBM X-Force ID: 124747.
CVE-2017-1597
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 Database Activity Monitor does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. IBM X-Force ID: 132610.
CVE-2018-1889
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152080.
CVE-2018-1891
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-17
IBM Security Guardium 10 and 10.5 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 152082.