Comments
Hackers Steal $31 Million From Russia's Central Bank
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Christian Bryant
50%
50%
Christian Bryant,
User Rank: Ninja
12/5/2016 | 7:47:23 PM
An Unfortunate Crime
I think what makes this the most unfortunate of crimes is that no matter what B$ various governments put each other through, and no matter who enlists cybercriminals to do dirty work for them, honest people are still going to get hurt.  All the worse when beefs between countries inspire criminal acts that are made to seem like foreign attacks.  We can't let honest people be left helpless and brought to financial ruin so easily.  The security industry should be able to do better, even to the point of preventing the very people who hire security analysts from doing harm within their own environments.  Yeah, sounds a little weird when you say it out loud, but there's some brainstorming to do on that one, still. 
Cerber 5
50%
50%
Cerber 5,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/5/2016 | 1:56:52 PM
Re: Hackers Steal $31 Million From Russia's Central Bank
2 billions doesn't sound like "failed to obtain" :))


'Hidden Tunnels' Help Hackers Launch Financial Services Attacks
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/20/2018
8 Security Tips for a Hassle-Free Summer Vacation
Steve Zurier, Freelance Writer,  6/23/2018
Inside a SamSam Ransomware Attack
Ajit Sancheti, CEO and Co-Founder, Preempt,  6/20/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-11446
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward (GRX), an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the "tr...
CVE-2018-12062
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin (SWFTC), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka t...
CVE-2018-12063
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token (INT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPri...
CVE-2018-12067
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum (SUB), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka t...
CVE-2018-12068
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-25
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin (TGT), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka ...