IoT
5/25/2016
01:10 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Internet Of Things Security-Certification Program Launched

ICSA Labs now offers a security testing program for IoT products, following the recently announced 'CyberUL' security certification program.

Network-connected devices in the industrial and consumer world—aka The Internet of Things (IoT)—now have a second program for testing and certifying their security: ICSA Labs today rolled out its own program for IoT vendors and customers.

ICSA Labs’ new IoT Certification Testing program comes on the heels of that of Underwriters Laboratories, which in April announced its much-anticipated Cybersecurity Assurance Program (UL CAP) that uses a newly created set of standards for IoT and critical infrastructure vendors to use for assessing security vulnerably and weaknesses in their products. ICSA Labs, an independent division of Verizon, says its new program will test six components of IoT devices: alert/logging; cryptography; authentication; communications; physical security; and platform security. 

UL’s program in its first phase tests for known vulnerabilities as well as authentication, access, encryption, and software updates, and plans to issue its first cybersecurity certifications in the third quarter. It tests connected cars, SIM cards and embedded SIMs, mobile devices and chipsets, smart home devices, wearables, and wireless devices.

George Japak, managing director for ICSA Labs, says his organization has been conducting third-party cybersecurity testing for 25 years, while UL’s new program represents a move from its traditional safety heritage to cybersecurity as well. "UL has been around for a very long time and they are well-respected, especially in the safety area. What they’re announcing is new for them ... In our case ... This is our 25th year of having [security] certification and testing programs around different technologies, which started with antivirus,” Japak says.

IoT and industrial products’ security woes are well-known and well-documented, with reams of research on connected car flaws, home automation devices, and plant-floor systems. Concerns over public safety in many of the consumer and industrial devices has raised alarm bells over better securing these devices, many of which are built without security in mind at all. Verizon estimates 25.6 billion IoT devices will be in the world by 2018, up from 9.7 billion in 2014. By 2020, look for 30 billion connected devices to be in the market.

“[IoT] vendors have been slow to adopt security, so they need a little nudge,” ICSA Labs’ Japak says.

Japak notes that IoT products can be anything from a medical device to a video camera. “A device is a device is a device,” connected to the network, he says. “It’s got some sort of embedded or other operating system ... there are no lack of interfaces on these devices. What’s lacking is any desire to secure them. We have a Dead Sea scroll with all of the problems in mobile apps that we test,” for example, he notes. And sensors—the heart and soul of many of these devices—are notoriously all about functionality, not security, according to Japak.

Remember the Ecosystem

IoT security experts say the only way security certification programs will truly improve IoT security, however, is if they provide deep testing of the entire IoT ecosystem. That would encompass the cloud infrastructure used by the product, any mobile or Web apps as well as third-party products that integrate with it, for instance, notes Cesar Cerrudo, CTO of IOActive Labs and an IoT security researcher.

“The deeper the testing the certification goes, the best it would be,” he says. “If you test the IoT device [only], maybe it’s secure, but then when used in real life, [it’s] completely broken by the complex relations with the ecosystem.”

Ted Harrington, executive partner of Independent Security Evaluators, says certification programs for IoT have their pros and cons for sure. “On the one hand, a program like this will undoubtedly have a positive impact on the IoT industry ... Security is still not effectively built into many of these solutions,” he says. An IoT cert program could help an IoT vendor get started in security, he says.

But the tradeoff of such a program is that just because a product earns a certification doesn’t guarantee it’s truly secure, Harrington says. “Where a certification program is very dangerous, is for organizations that would perceive the program as a complete blessing for the security of a product,” he says. “Certification programs must be adaptable in order to work for a wide range of organizations, yet all organizations have unique needs, use cases, and threat models.”

So even an IoT product that earns a certification is likely to still have security gaps, he says. “Target was PCI-compliant, yet Target suffered a security breach. That’s a great case study that compliance doesn’t mean your system is completely resilient. That’s the risk of certification programs.”

Another issue is vendors potentially misusing certifications for marketing purposes. “Some certs end up just being something that companies pay for ... to have a seal to show to customers, but it doesn’t add much real value in terms of security,” IOActive’s Cerrudo says.

ICSA Labs charges a flat fee for an annual contract for its certification testing program. The fee can run from “a few thousand” to more than $100,000, Japak says. Its testbed to date has evaluated everything from DVRs and video cameras to home security devices.

An ICSA Labs certification means that the product underwent a testing program and any vulnerabilities or security weaknesses were fixed; like UL’s, testing occurs on an ongoing basis to catch any new flaws.

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, you were supposed to display UNICODE characters!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
As cyber attackers become more sophisticated and enterprise defenses become more complex, many enterprises are faced with a complicated question: what is the risk of an IT security breach? This report delivers insight on how today's enterprises evaluate the risks they face. This report also offers a look at security professionals' concerns about a wide variety of threats, including cloud security, mobile security, and the Internet of Things.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.