Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits


Topics:   Insider Threat Tech Center : Security Views

Are We Missing the Point?

Recently there has been a lot of talk about nuclear weapons, terrorism, and peace treaties. At the end of the day, the question remains: how do we protect a country and its citizens from attack? If that is really the purpose of the summits and the meetings, why isn't cybersecurity part of the discussion -- more importantly, the insider threat?

Aug 29, 2010 | 06:20 PM | 

By Eric Cole
Dark Reading

Recently there has been a lot of talk about nuclear weapons, terrorism, and peace treaties. At the end of the day, the question remains: how do we protect a country and its citizens from attack? If that is really the purpose of the summits and the meetings, why isn't cybersecurity part of the discussion -- more importantly, the insider threat?They deserve to be. It's true that nuclear weapons or biological warfare is much more damaging and could cause greater loss of life, but the likelihood of such an attack is low. When it comes to a cyberattack, the impact is high, the likelihood is high and the ease in which the attack can be performed is high. National security is about managing and mitigating risk, and therefore more attention should be given to these cyber weapons of mass destruction. At the top of the agenda should be better protecting critical information from the insider. There have been a lot of very technical, sophisticated attacks recently, and we sometimes forget that the entry point for most of these attacks is an insider clicking a link or going to a site that they should not have gone to.

When you evaluate a threat, there are many aspects (too many to mention in this posting) that need to be evaluated. Some of the primary ones are clearly impact, likelihood, and ease of which the attack can be performed. Using this as a basis, things become very interesting. While the impact of a nuclear or biological terrorist attack is clearly very high, the likelihood is more in the medium level and the ease of which it could be performed is medium to low. When it comes to cyberattack, the impact is high, the likelihood is high, and the ease is high. Therefore, since national security is about managing and mitigating risk, shouldn't more attention be paid to the cyber weapons of mass destruction and controlling access to our critical information?

If we start to peel back the layers, things become even more interesting based on the overall exposure and scope of the problem. Physical weapons have to cross international boundaries and there are checkpoints that have to be cleared. The three important points to remember are 1) you cannot clearly cross international boundaries with physical weapons without going through physical checkpoints; 2) weapons are illegal in most countries, so clear possession of them could get someone in significant trouble; 3) it is relatively difficult to obtain these weapons.

When you start to apply this to cyber and insider threat, things start to fall apart very quickly. On the Internet there are no international boundaries. An attacker/insider can seamlessly cross boundaries without even knowing they are entering systems located in a different country. Not only are the tools easy (say free) to obtain, but in some countries possessing and use of the tools are not illegal.

There is a lot of legislation being proposed to cover cyber, but are we focusing in on the correct areas. Are we looking at controlling the boundaries and in/out of countries and working on universal laws? Having different laws for different countries makes sense when there are clear boundaries and physical separation, but when connectivity is seamless, that model falls apart. While changing laws can take a long time to perform, there are things organizations can do today to help protect the critical infrastructure from the accidental or deliberate insider. First, identify and clearly control and manage ALL boundaries in and out of your organization. For critical information, air gaps or complete separation should be looked at to better control the boundaries. Focusing on wanted trusted insiders have access to the information.

Second, focus on critical information. Why would your organization be targeted and what information would cause the greatest impact? Who inside the organizations has access to this information and can be targeted?

Third, the entry point for most attacks is the end users. Focus time and energy on protecting and controlling the endpoint, especially untrusted endpoints. Always remember that while it is difficult to stop stupid, with proper controls and focus on the insider, you can limit or minimize the impact of stupid.

We are going to have to deal with this problem one way or another. Option one is to be proactive and fix the problem before it is too late. Option two is to wait for there to be a major problem and fix it in a reactive manner.

Personally, I vote for option one.

Dr. Eric Cole, Ph.D., is a security expert with more than 15 years of hands-on experience. Cole has experience in information technology with a focus on perimeter defense, secure network design, vulnerability discovery, penetration testing, and intrusion detection systems. He is the author of several books, including Hackers Beware, Hiding in Plain Site, Network Security Bible, and Insider Threat. He is the inventor of more than 20 patents, and is a researcher, writer, and speaker. Cole is a member of the Commission on Cyber Security for the 44th President and several executive advisory boards, and is CTO of the Americas for McAfee. Cole is involved with the SANS Technology Institute (STI) and SANS working with students, teaching, and maintaining and developing courseware. He is a SANS fellow, instructor, and course author.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Insider Threat Reports

report How to Prevent an Illicit Data Dump
There are no silver bullets when it comes to protecting company and customer data from loss or theft, but there are technological and procedural systems that will go a long way toward preventing a WikiLeaks-like data dump. Here are some tips and tricks to help protect your organization's most sensitive information.

report Email and Data Loss
Email encryption, rights management, email gateways, and full-on data loss prevention systems can keep corporate data secure. Here's a look at the pros and cons of each, to help you determine what?s best for your business.

report An Insider Threat Reality check
Heightened concern that users could inadvertently expose or leak -- or purposely steal -- an organization's sensitive data has spurred debate over the proper technology and training to protect the crown jewels. In this special retrospective of recent news coverage, Dark Reading takes a look at how organizations are handling the threat -- and what users are really up to.

Other reports from the Insider Threat Tech Center:

Related Content

Protection from Insider Threats
Preventing data misuse by trusted users is the most difficult information protection challenge. Insiders already have full authorization to the data, making traditional IT secure methods in effective. Learn about a more powerful security approach and proven strategies to prevent insider misuse.

Strategies for Protecting Intellectual Property
A company's intellectual property (IP) represents a significant portion of assets and a critical component of competitive differentiation, but the potential value of any IP is directly linked to its limit of acceptable use. Learn how you can put your IP to work within collaborative environments without undue risk and maximize competitive advantages.

Protecting Against WikiLeaks Type Events and the Insider Threat
The sensitive information supplied to WikiLeaks and other social justice websites comes from trusted insiders. Get the answers to the open gaps left in the WikiLeaks story and learn how you can prevent insider threats that are just as detrimental in your organization.

Insider Threat: An Inside Look at a Fortune 100 Company's Prevention Program
The ways and means by which a privileged user can successfully steal proprietary data today is staggering. One venerable company that suffered a devastating incident decided to do something about it. Find out how it built one of the most productive insider threat prevention programs in the Fortune 100.

Protection of Intellectual Property and Trade Secrets across a Global Enterprise
As a designer and manufacturer of industrial technology, this Fortune 50 company knew that securing their intellectual property (IP) and trade secret data was essential. It created a program to identify risks to their IP and trade secrets and soon caught a privileged user attempting to compromise IP. Download this case study to see a real example of intellectual property protection at work.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports