“While the need to recover data is often time sensitive, every effort must be made to ensure that the organization’s confidential and sensitive data is protected during the recovery process,” said Michael Hall, CISO at DriveSavers Data Recovery. “The consequence of using an unscrupulous data recovery vendor can lead to loss or theft of sensitive and confidential information. That could mean a major disruption in business, financial loss and in some cases, closure of the business.”
Ponemon interviewed 769 IT security and IT support practitioners in US healthcare, financial and government organizations, most of who report to CIOs and CISOs. Here are the study highlights:
Increased Use of Third-Party Data Recovery Vendors (as often as once a week) – Eighty-five percent of the respondents report their organizations have used or will continue to use a third-party data recovery service provider to recover lost data. This is an increase from 79 percent in the previous study. In fact, 39 percent say they use third parties at least once each week or more.
Loss of Business-critical Data Drives Use of Data Recovery Vendors – Organizations most often use third party data recovery vendors when intellectual property, financial information and customer/patient data files have been lost. IT desktop and helpdesk support managers typically select data recovery service providers. Mandated to close job tickets fast, speed ranks higher than security in their selection criterion according to the study.
IT Security Often Excluded from Data Recovery Vendor Selection Process – Fifty-four percent of respondents confirmed that IT security is excluded from selecting third-party data recovery providers, which could play a role in IT support’s placement of speed over security. Organizations admit that they need to improve their due diligence for vetting third-party vendors and their data recovery certification.
Data Breaches on the Rise at Data Recovery Vendors – Of the 87 percent of respondents who experienced a data breach in the past two years, 21 percent say the breach occurred when a drive was in the possession of a data recovery vendor. This is an increase from the previous Ponemon study. Many respondents who experienced a data breach during the data recovery process point to the vendor’s lack of security protocols.
Unknown Whether Cloud Service Providers Would Report a Data Loss/Recovery Incident – More than half of the surveyed organizations use a cloud storage service provider. While 69 percent of the respondents feel notification from the cloud provider should be required if their servers crash and drives are outsourced for data recovery, only a small percent (less than 10 percent) are confident that their service provider would notify them if they engaged the services of a data recovery provider. Fifty-seven percent are not confident that they would be informed at all.
Leading Security Guidelines are not Considered When Selecting a Data Recovery Provider – According to the study, 54 percent of respondents do not require third-party data recovery vendors to comply with leading security guidelines such National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and International Organization of Standards for Business, Government and Society (ISO).
Based on the Ponemon findings, organizations should have policy and guidelines in place for selecting and using a data recovery service provider. In addition, organizations need to address potential new threats to the security of data during the data recovery process, including business associate agreements for cloud storage providers that outline the need for notification should a data loss occur and the services of a data recovery vendor be engaged. Respondents of the Ponemon studies developed a Data Security Checklist for vetting third-party data recovery service providers.
Healthcare organizations, government agencies and financial organizations are required by law to meet the most stringent data security guidelines and are now requiring third-party data recovery vendors to meet these same guidelines. DriveSavers adheres to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Data Security Rule (GLBA), the Data-At-Rest mandate (DAR), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
About DriveSavers
DriveSavers Data Recovery, the worldwide leader in data recovery services, provides the fastest, most reliable and only certified secure data recovery service in the industry. DriveSavers is the only data recovery company to post proof of annual, company-wide SAS 70 Type II Audit Reports and its HIPAA data security compliance. DriveSavers High Security Service adheres to US Government security protocols, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Data Security Rule (GLBA), the Data-At-Rest mandate (DAR) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). DriveSavers maintains the most technologically advanced Certified ISO 5 (Class 100) cleanroom in the industry and is authorized to open storage devices by all major storage device manufacturers without voiding the warranty. DriveSavers engineers are trained and certified in all leading encryption and forensics technologies. Satisfied customers include: Bank of America, Google, Lucasfilm, NASA, Harvard University, Salvation Army and The Rolling Stones. (http://www.drivesaversdatarecovery.com)
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
How to Prevent an Illicit Data Dump
There are no silver bullets when it comes to protecting company and customer data from loss or theft, but there are technological and procedural systems that will go a long way toward preventing a WikiLeaks-like data dump. Here are some tips and tricks to help protect your organization's most sensitive information.
Email and Data Loss
Email encryption, rights management, email gateways, and full-on data loss prevention systems can keep corporate data secure. Here's a look at the pros and cons of each, to help you determine what?s best for your business.
An Insider Threat Reality check
Heightened concern that users could inadvertently expose or leak -- or purposely steal -- an organization's sensitive data has spurred debate over the proper technology and training to protect the crown jewels. In this special retrospective of recent news coverage, Dark Reading takes a look at how organizations are handling the threat -- and what users are really up to.
Other reports from the Insider Threat Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Protection from Insider Threats
Preventing data misuse by trusted users is the most difficult information protection challenge. Insiders already have full authorization to the data, making traditional IT secure methods in effective. Learn about a more powerful security approach and proven strategies to prevent insider misuse.
Strategies for Protecting Intellectual Property
A company's intellectual property (IP) represents a significant portion of assets and a critical component of competitive differentiation, but the potential value of any IP is directly linked to its limit of acceptable use. Learn how you can put your IP to work within collaborative environments without undue risk and maximize competitive advantages.
Protecting Against WikiLeaks Type Events and the Insider Threat
The sensitive information supplied to WikiLeaks and other social justice websites comes from trusted insiders. Get the answers to the open gaps left in the WikiLeaks story and learn how you can prevent insider threats that are just as detrimental in your organization.
Insider Threat: An Inside Look at a Fortune 100 Company's Prevention Program
The ways and means by which a privileged user can successfully steal proprietary data today is staggering. One venerable company that suffered a devastating incident decided to do something about it. Find out how it built one of the most productive insider threat prevention programs in the Fortune 100.
Protection of Intellectual Property and Trade Secrets across a Global Enterprise
As a designer and manufacturer of industrial technology, this Fortune 50 company knew that securing their intellectual property (IP) and trade secret data was essential. It created a program to identify risks to their IP and trade secrets and soon caught a privileged user attempting to compromise IP. Download this case study to see a real example of intellectual property protection at work.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>