Rustock -- which in March was knocked offline by federal authorities and Microsoft -- was able to send some 30 billion spam messages a day, such as for phony Pfizer prescription drugs and fake Microsoft lottery scams. FireEye, researchers at the University of Washington, Pfizer, the Dutch High Tech Crime Unit, and the Chinese CERT all assisted in the operation to take down the botnet, which had an army of some 1.6 million machines worldwide at its peak. And there are still some 700,000 machines infected with the botnet's malware, according to a recent report from Microsoft.
Richard Boscovich, senior attorney for Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit, announced today that the company had decided to supplement its civil discovery efforts with the cash reward. Last month, Microsoft published notices in two Russian newspapers in an effort to alert the Rustock operators of the civil lawsuit against them. The reward was a way to turn up the "heat as a result of the evidence we have secured during the discovery process," Boscovich said in response to an inquiry from Dark Reading. However, he did not elaborate on just what that evidence might be.
The $250,000 reward is available to anyone offering new information that results in the arrest and conviction of the Rustock operators. Microsoft will be gathering information via email, at avreward@microsoft.com.
"This reward offer stems from Microsoft’s recognition that the Rustock botnet is responsible for a number of criminal activities and serves to underscore our commitment to tracking down those behind it. While the primary goal for our legal and technical operation has been to stop and disrupt the threat that Rustock has posed for everyone affected by it, we also believe the Rustock bot-herders should be held accountable for their actions," Boscovich said in a blog post.
He said the company has gathered "strong evidence" in the case, and that Microsoft continues to help clean up Rustock-infected machines.
Gunter Ollmann, vice president of research at Damballa, says a bounty will put pressure on the botnet operators, and on potential informants. "Offering a bounty increases the pressure on all those involved with the Rustock botnet and hopefully serves as a notice to the other botnet operators who’ve picked up the spam-delivery slack to build up their own businesses," he says. "As a threat to the Rustock operators, I believe that the bounty will increase the pressure on other informants to disclose their information. $250,000 will be tempting to many, especially when there are so many competing factions within the spam botnet industry."
The move also shows how Microsoft isn't afraid to flex some muscle in its fight against botnets. "This continues to show the level of commitment Microsoft has to combat cybercriminals and foster international cooperation on these efforts. This bounty is just one example of what they are willing -- and able -- to do to put a serious dent in the cybercrime landscape," says Alex Lanstein, senior researcher at FireEye, who worked on the Rustock takedown.
A copy of Microsoft's notice of pleadings is available here. It includes summons for 11 "John Doe" plaintiffs associated with Rustock.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
How to Prevent an Illicit Data Dump
There are no silver bullets when it comes to protecting company and customer data from loss or theft, but there are technological and procedural systems that will go a long way toward preventing a WikiLeaks-like data dump. Here are some tips and tricks to help protect your organization's most sensitive information.
Email and Data Loss
Email encryption, rights management, email gateways, and full-on data loss prevention systems can keep corporate data secure. Here's a look at the pros and cons of each, to help you determine what?s best for your business.
An Insider Threat Reality check
Heightened concern that users could inadvertently expose or leak -- or purposely steal -- an organization's sensitive data has spurred debate over the proper technology and training to protect the crown jewels. In this special retrospective of recent news coverage, Dark Reading takes a look at how organizations are handling the threat -- and what users are really up to.
Other reports from the Insider Threat Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Protection from Insider Threats
Preventing data misuse by trusted users is the most difficult information protection challenge. Insiders already have full authorization to the data, making traditional IT secure methods in effective. Learn about a more powerful security approach and proven strategies to prevent insider misuse.
Strategies for Protecting Intellectual Property
A company's intellectual property (IP) represents a significant portion of assets and a critical component of competitive differentiation, but the potential value of any IP is directly linked to its limit of acceptable use. Learn how you can put your IP to work within collaborative environments without undue risk and maximize competitive advantages.
Protecting Against WikiLeaks Type Events and the Insider Threat
The sensitive information supplied to WikiLeaks and other social justice websites comes from trusted insiders. Get the answers to the open gaps left in the WikiLeaks story and learn how you can prevent insider threats that are just as detrimental in your organization.
Insider Threat: An Inside Look at a Fortune 100 Company's Prevention Program
The ways and means by which a privileged user can successfully steal proprietary data today is staggering. One venerable company that suffered a devastating incident decided to do something about it. Find out how it built one of the most productive insider threat prevention programs in the Fortune 100.
Protection of Intellectual Property and Trade Secrets across a Global Enterprise
As a designer and manufacturer of industrial technology, this Fortune 50 company knew that securing their intellectual property (IP) and trade secret data was essential. It created a program to identify risks to their IP and trade secrets and soon caught a privileged user attempting to compromise IP. Download this case study to see a real example of intellectual property protection at work.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>