Analytics
8/20/2013
04:13 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Execs, Technical Staff Don't See Eye To Eye In Secure Application Development Progress

New Ponemon Group report finds major rifts in how executives, technical staffers feel about their enterprise secure application development programs

If you ask most executives, they'll say their company's secure application development practices are solid. But if you ask the developers and technologists in the trenches, the story is much different.

New data released today by the Ponemon Group and commissioned by application security vendor Security Innovation shows a major disconnect between business leaders and their IT groups when it comes to the success and effectiveness of internal secure coding practices.

"The big surprise is the difference between senior [executives] and the rank-and-file" on whether enterprises are employing true secure application development life cycles, says Larry Ponemon, CEO and founder of The Ponemon Group. "The rank-and-file [view] is a better indicator of reality."

In what Ponemon Group's report calls "a serious and potentially dangerous misalignment," some 75 percent of executives surveyed for the report believe their organizations have "defined, secure architecture standards" in their programming. But only 23 percent of technicians agree or strongly agree with that statement.

The same dichotomy is apparent when it comes to whether enterprises are measuring application developers for compliance with those standards, according to the data.

Training is also in the eyes of the beholder: While 71 percent of execs believe their internal training and education programs are updated and in line with the latest threats, app security policies, and best practices, just 19 percent of the technical staff is on the same page.

"I view the executives as blissfully ignorant [rather than their] having a rosier picture. I'm a security guy, so I'm naturally more skeptical," says Ed Adams, CEO of Security Innovations.

Adams says the education and training issue is especially disconcerting. "They want them to write secure code, yet you've got this disillusionment at the executive level, who owns the budget," he says. "It's needed, it's wanted, but it's not getting delivered because of this perception gap."

According to the report, the perception problem is likely due to "poor communication and collaboration" among the players in application development and security.

Even so, overall, there are some positive developments in enterprise secure app development. Some 42 percent of organizations say their application security requirements are defined. "That's a good sign," Adams says. "That number was dramatically lower in 2008."

And some 43 percent of enterprises say they employ automated scanning tools during development of software and after its release. "That alone is a very positive statement," Adams says.

Other findings from the report: Most enterprises don't identify or measure app security risks, and most are only taking basic steps in application security. The full report is available here for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Threat Intel Today
Threat Intel Today
The 397 respondents to our new survey buy into using intel to stay ahead of attackers: 85% say threat intelligence plays some role in their IT security strategies, and many of them subscribe to two or more third-party feeds; 10% leverage five or more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3352
Published: 2014-08-30
Cisco Intelligent Automation for Cloud (aka Cisco Cloud Portal) 2008.3_SP9 and earlier does not properly consider whether a session is a problematic NULL session, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via crafted packets, related to an "iFrame vulnerability," aka Bug ID CSCuh...

CVE-2014-3908
Published: 2014-08-30
The Amazon.com Kindle application before 4.5.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

CVE-2010-5110
Published: 2014-08-29
DCTStream.cc in Poppler before 0.13.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PDF file.

CVE-2012-1503
Published: 2014-08-29
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Six Apart (formerly Six Apart KK) Movable Type (MT) Pro 5.13 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the comment section.

CVE-2013-5467
Published: 2014-08-29
Monitoring Agent for UNIX Logs 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP09, and 6.2.3 through FP04 and Monitoring Server (ms) and Shared Libraries (ax) 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP08, 6.2.3 through FP01, and 6.3.0 through FP01 in IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM)...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
This episode of Dark Reading Radio looks at infosec security from the big enterprise POV with interviews featuring Ron Plesco, Cyber Investigations, Intelligence & Analytics at KPMG; and Chris Inglis & Chris Bell of Securonix.