Endpoint

4/11/2017
10:30 AM
Michael Sutton
Michael Sutton
Commentary
50%
50%

When Hacks Are about Image instead of Money

If you think fake news is a problem, how about the possibility of fake medical or financial information making the rounds with no way to verify its legitimacy?

Recent leaks, intelligence reports and the world’s response to them have set a new precedent. Cyberattacks are no longer just for the sake of siphoning data or extortion, but for discrediting their targets, be they large entities or individuals.

Incidents, ranging from the DNC hack to the record compromises of Yahoo, have been more than opportunistic — they’ve happened with full intent to mar and compromise the target’s image. Regardless of who did it, there was no ransom, there was no financial information stolen. Instead, there were seemingly purposeful leaks, timed breaches, and the expected public fallout.

And because these campaigns were successful, we’re likely to see an increase in cyberespionage and sabotage campaigns in the year to come. Now, more than ever, we need to shore up our defenses or continue to suffer attacks on public image and reputation that could have impactful and long-term effects.

It's already Happening
The incidents I briefly touch on above are not the first of their kind. The Sony Pictures hack and the Ashley Madison breach are two prime examples.

At Sony, attackers destroyed data and leaked compromising emails, and they aired the dirty laundry of company employees and contacts. Monetary gain was never the goal of the hack; the goal was to bend the company into submission, allegedly so that it would not release the movie The Interview.

At Ashley Madison, the breach exposed the data of users looking for clandestine affairs via the website. If an important name was on the list and a malicious actor caught wind of it, it was certain to become a problem for that individual. It sent users into a panic. And the company itself was caught using fem-bots and other underhanded measures to entice users. The fallout was real.

Most hacks damage a target’s reputation, especially for not being able to protect itself. But something has changed, and now we see more high-profile hacks where the main objective is to damage the victim’s public image. And now, the trend has slowly grown to become a real problem we will have to deal with in 2017 — even if you are not a Presidential candidate or media megabrand.

Tampering and Tarnishing People
The biggest risks from these hacks is not the exposure of personally identifying information, but the erosion of trust in our organizations and notable figures. This is because cyberespionage and sabotage campaigns don’t just deal with leaked information. Once a hacker gains high-privilege access to a network, he or she can change internal data, public-facing assets and even insert fake data. If you think fake news is a problem, what about the possibility of fake medical or financial information making the rounds with no way to verify its legitimacy?

Unfortunately, like most issues in security, there isn’t a straightforward solution to the problem. It’s impossible to predict how extortion can take place, or what data will be used to tarnish the victim’s image.

There are the normal steps to safeguard sensitive data — e.g. multi-factor authentication, segmenting networks, encryption, and training. But it will remain difficult when just one click on a phishing email by an inattentive user could mean it’s too late. And the slew of smart devices invading networks, often unbeknownst to IT, is another issue.

Still, there is good reason for optimism in new, automated technology that leverages machine learning and automated intelliegence. These tools will help the human element in security address these higher level concerns, and perhaps do something about the attacks on trust we will continue to face.

[Check out the two-day Dark Reading Cybersecurity Crash Course at Interop ITX, May 15 & 16, where Dark Reading editors and some of the industry's top cybersecurity experts will share the latest data security trends and best practices.]

Related Content:

 

Michael Sutton has dedicated his career to conducting leading-edge security research, building world-class security teams and educating others on a variety of security topics. As CISO, Sutton drives internal security and heads Zscaler's Office of the CISO. Zscaler has built ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
YuliaY807
50%
50%
YuliaY807,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/11/2017 | 10:47:32 AM
nice post
Really nice post, thank you a lot!
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.