Endpoint //

Privacy

5/25/2018
12:25 PM
50%
50%

Privacy Survey Says: Americans Don't Want to Sell Their Data

A new survey shows the extent to which Americans are reluctant to sell their personal information for any price.

A new study says that many of the assumptions corporations have been making about consumers and their privacy are seriously flawed. And in the new dawn of GDPR, those bad assumptions could have serious consequences.

The study, conducted by digital communications firm Syzygy, surveyed 3,000 adults in the US, UK, and Germany. Asked whether they would sell their private data to a company — even a favored brand — 55% of Americans say that they would not, no matter the price offered.

One of the major surprises in the data came from the question of whether consumers would trade private information for a smoother or more personal online experience. While it is an article of faith for many online companies and services that consumers are happy to make this trade, only 21% of  Americans are willing to do so.

For those who are willing to sell their data to companies, $150 is the median price they would accept. And when it comes to ongoing monitoring of online activity, 33% say they would be willing to let Google watch them Web-surf — in exchange for $25 a month.

For more, read here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 6:02:52 PM
$25 by Google
This would not happen in my view, they may not be making that much money per personal record.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 6:01:17 PM
Re: Surprised?
t paralyzes individuals into never wanting to provide personal data. That is true in my view too. Accessive data collaction is scary.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:59:21 PM
Re: Surprised?
Unfortunately, this has been escalated to the point where too much data is acquired needlessly. I agree with this. For facebook more data is better, so result is not that great for the memebers.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:57:54 PM
Re: Surprised?
How is this surprising in any way? It is for me partially. We tend to not care about privacy that much if we get something out of it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/30/2018 | 5:56:30 PM
Personal data
It depends what we mean by personl data. If first name, last name and email I think i would sell it with quite low price, knowing that it is out there already.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2018 | 1:16:43 PM
Surprised?
How is this surprising in any way? There are only certain functions that require the use of personal information. Unfortunately, this has been escalated to the point where too much data is acquired needlessly. It paralyzes individuals into never wanting to provide personal data.
Who Takes Responsibility for Cyberattacks in the Cloud?
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: On the SS7 network, nobody knows you're a dog.
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-18812
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
The Spotfire Library component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace, and TIBCO Spotfire Server contains a vulnerability that might theoretically fail to restrict users with read-only access from modifying files stored in the Spotfire Library, only when the S...
CVE-2018-18813
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
The Spotfire web server component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace, and TIBCO Spotfire Server contains multiple vulnerabilities that may allow persistent and reflected cross-site scripting attacks. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO Spotfire...
CVE-2018-18814
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
The TIBCO Spotfire authentication component of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Spotfire Analytics Platform for AWS Marketplace, and TIBCO Spotfire Server contains a vulnerability in the handling of the authentication that theoretically may allow an attacker to gain full access to a target account, indep...
CVE-2018-5740
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
"deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is i...
CVE-2018-5741
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
To provide fine-grained controls over the ability to use Dynamic DNS (DDNS) to update records in a zone, BIND 9 provides a feature called update-policy. Various rules can be configured to limit the types of updates that can be performed by a client, depending on the key used when sending the update ...