Endpoint

11/11/2016
03:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Abusing Market Dominance In AV Space, Kaspersky Lab Says

Redmond is unfairly shutting out rivals and uninstalling third-party tools without user permission, Kaspersky says.

Software vendor Kaspersky Lab wants Microsoft to stop being a bully and give smaller companies like it a fair shot at competing in the highly competitive market for antivirus products.

The Moscow-based company this week filed complaints with antitrust authorities in the European Union, Russia, and elsewhere over what it claims are anti-competitive practices by Microsoft.

It accused the Redmond-based behemoth of abusing its dominant market position to foist the Microsoft Defender antivirus product on end users while creating obstacles for rivals to get their products in front of them.

“We think that Microsoft has been using its dominating position in the market of operating systems to create competitive advantages for its own product,” said Eugene Kaspersky, the CEO and founder of his eponymously named security firm.

“[Microsoft] is also creating obstacles for companies to access the market, and infringes upon the interests of independent developers of security products,” Kaspersky said in a sharply worded diatribe on the company’s blog.

Kaspersky listed several issues that he said highlighted Microsoft’s abusive practices.

One gripe involves what he says is the nasty habit by Windows 10 to change settings, uninstall user-installed third-party apps and replacing them with Microsoft apps, without so much as a ‘by your leave’.

For example when a user upgrades to Windows 10, Microsoft automatically deactivates any "incompatible" security software it finds on the system and installs Defender instead.

Independent software developers were given just seven days before the release of Windows 10 to make their software compatible with the new operating system. So it is not surprising that many products installed on user systems are incompatible, Kaspersky said.

When a user does have a compatible AV product, Windows 10 displays an alarming-sounding notice urging users to click and button for activating Defender. But when they do click on the button it also deactivates any other third-party antivirus product on the system, Kaspersky claimed.

Microsoft has also made it harder in Windows 10 for users to know when their existing license for a security product might have expired so they don’t renew it in a timely fashion. In such instances, Microsoft simply deactivates the product and turns Defender on instead.

“Actually, Microsoft’s actions aren’t only making things worse for users and killing off the whole ecosystem of independent developers; they’re also undermining users’ trust in Microsoft,” he said,

Specifically, Kaspersky Lab wants antitrust authorities in the various countries where it has raised the issue, to make Microsoft provide new Windows versions and updates in a quicker fashion to independent developers so they can maintain compatibility of their software with the operating system.

Kaspersky Lab also wants Microsoft to explicitly inform users about the presence of potentially incompatible software on their systems when upgrading Windows and about the need to install compatible versions of the same software after the upgrade. Lastly, the company wants regulators to ensure that Microsoft does not enable Windows Defender by default on end user systems and instead require explicit permission from users before doing so.

In a statement Friday, Microsoft did not respond to any of the complaints raised by Kaspersky in his blog. Instead the company noted its long history of cooperation with Kaspersky Lab and its commitment to complying with Russian laws. “The company hasn’t received an official notification from [Federal Antimonopoly Service],” the statement said referring to the body that enforces Russian fair competition laws. “As soon as we get it, we will review it carefully,” the statement noted.

Despite long-standing analyst prognostications about the commoditization of the antivirus market space and the growing inadequacy of these tools against modern threats, demand for AV products such as those sold by Kaspersky continues to be robust and is serviced by numerous vendors.

At the end of last year Microsoft led the market with an early 16% share, followed by Avast and Malwarebytes with 15% and 11.6%, respectively, according to market share numbers from OPSWAT. Avast’s $1.3 billion purchase of AVG earlier this year has put the combined entity on top of the pile.

Kaspersky meanwhile ranks in the Top 10 AV vendor list with a market share of around 4%.

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lenson88
50%
50%
lenson88,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/12/2016 | 6:42:30 PM
http://www.192168ll.net/ www.192168ll.net
Russia investigates Microsoft for allegedly blocking Kaspersky software.
Lily652
50%
50%
Lily652,
User Rank: Moderator
11/12/2016 | 4:54:47 AM
prayer times

Kaspersky is a monopoly in their field and in their area, so that he did not, it will be accepted with a positive assessment. 

 

Cybersecurity's 'Broken' Hiring Process
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/11/2017
Ransomware Grabs Headlines but BEC May Be a Bigger Threat
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  10/12/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Search Cybersecuruty and you will get unicorn.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.