Endpoint

3/21/2018
04:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Gartner Expects 2018 IoT Security Spending to Reach $1.5 Billion

Regulations, breach concerns will push spending to over $3 billion by 2021, analyst firm says.

Enterprises worldwide will spend $1.5 billion this year protecting their IoT networks and connected devices against a range of security threats, according to new estimates from Gartner.

That figure represents a 28% increase from the $1.2 billion spent on IoT security last year and reflects growing enterprise concern over vulnerabilities in IoT and connected networks. Gartner says by 2021, such concerns will push IoT security spending to over $3.1 billion.

"Exposure to IoT-based threats may come from unauthorized devices that connect to enterprise systems and that the enterprise does not control," says Ruggero Contu, research director at Gartner. In that sense, IoT networks and devices present the same problem to enterprises that any shadow IT does, he says.

"There is also the potential issue of organizations being vulnerable to devices owned by third-party business partners or suppliers," he says. One example is a business that uses facilities like smart buildings - which they might not own - and may be a source of new threats.

IoT-based attacks are a reality, Contu says. A recent survey by CEB Inc., a research firm that Gartner acquired last April, found that nearly 20% of organizations with IoT networks have experienced at least one IoT-related attack already.

Enterprise IoT vulnerabilities pose a threat to the devices themselves, the data in them, the services they may handle, and the broader enterprise network. As malware like Mirai hammered home, attackers can also take advantage of vulnerable IoT devices to build massive botnets for launching DDoS attacks and distributing malware.

Concerns over such issues are growing as organizations across the spectrum are connecting more devices to the Internet to establish a pervasive digital presence, according to Gartner.

Operational Technology (OT) such as industrial control systems and elements of smart grids such as smart meters, vehicles, and smart buildings are all examples of enterprise IoT, Contu notes. "Internet connectivity allows for improvements in operations — such as predictive maintenance," he says. It also enables the delivery of more customized services, improvements in customer experience, and data aggregation for business strategy improvements.

Despite the broadening IoT footprint, many organizations have not prioritized or implemented security best practices for protecting the environment, according to Gartner.

Where IoT security has been implemented, it is usually at the business-unit level with some cooperation from IT departments. However, there is little effort to coordinate IoT security via a common architecture or through a consistent security strategy, the firm said in its report. IoT vendor, product, and service selection at many enterprises remains largely ad hoc and few IoT security practices have been codified into policy or repeatable best practices.

IoT's Inherent Insecurities

The lack of security by design in the IoT devices is another huge problem. Many devices that enterprises have begun connecting to the Internet have little by way of security protections and, worse, are not equipped even to receive OS updates, security patches and over the air fixes, Contu says.

Security vendor Avira points to 2017 scanning data from Shodan that showed over 128.7 million IoT devices exposed to the Internet in the US alone out of which 25 million were vulnerable to a total of 45 different exploits.

"It's what we always see with big pushes in technology," says Bryan Singer, director of security services for IOActive. "There's a race to be first to market and unfortunately, when that happens, we're not paying enough attention to full supply chain security," he says.

"The bottom line is that IoT devices and apps are so nascent right now that [they really don't] represent the maturity of code design we see elsewhere," Singer says. Hardware and software is not often fully vetted for security issues and many IoT startups are just not disciplined enough when it comes to testing software design. "With the explosive growth of devices, we're seeing explosive IoT vulnerabilities because devices are designed and deployed without security in mind."

Troublingly, over the next few years expect to see a lot of companies turn to hosted services for their IoT data collection and management needs, Singer says. This will create new problems over data control and security, he says.

Brian Contos, CISO of Verodin, says that from a security industry perspective there was an expectation early on that the manufactures of many of the products that constitute the IoT would bake security into their devices. Unfortunately, that has simply not happened in a broad enough manner, he says.

"And there are so many IoT device types and vendors that it’s challenging to determine what risks they bring and what levels of controls can be implemented to mitigate that risk," he says. The net result is that just like happened with IT security: everybody's playing security catch-up with IoT security as well, Contos says.

Tools

Gartner predicts that concerns over IoT risks will drive spending for tools and services that can help organization discover and manage IoT assets on the network, perform security assessments of IoT hardware and software, and conduct penetration testing. Professional services will account for $946 million of the $1.5 billion in total that organizations will spend on IoT security this year, according to Gartner. By 2021, IoT security service spending will more than double to nearly $2.1 billion.

IoT endpoint security tools, such as those for asset discovery and management, are another area where Gartner expects enterprises to spend a lot of money over the next few years. In 2018 organizations will spend upwards of $370 million on endpoint security and over $630 million in 2021. Spending on products that secure IoT gateways will more double from $186 million this year to $415 million in 2021.

"It makes sense that IoT security spending is on the rise and will continue to increase moving forward," says Tyler Reguly, manager of software development at Tripwire.

The enterprise attack surface just continues to broaden with everything, including kitchen gadgets such as slow cookers, coffee pots, and refrigerators being interconnected, he says. "These new devices with their lack of centralized management and no formal patching processes are an administrator's worst nightmare."

Related Content:

 

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the security track here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
Lessons from My Strange Journey into InfoSec
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  7/12/2018
What's Cooking With Caleb Sima
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2016-9574
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
nss before version 3.30 is vulnerable to a remote denial of service during the session handshake when using SessionTicket extension and ECDHE-ECDSA.
CVE-2017-2673
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
An authorization-check flaw was discovered in federation configurations of the OpenStack Identity service (keystone). An authenticated federated user could request permissions to a project and unintentionally be granted all related roles including administrative roles.
CVE-2017-7481
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe. If an attacker could control the results of lookup() calls, they could inject Unicode strings to be parsed by the jinja2 templating system, resulting in code execution. By default, the jinja2 templati...
CVE-2018-12911
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
WebKitGTK+ 2.20.3 has an off-by-one error, with a resultant out-of-bounds write, in the get_simple_globs functions in ThirdParty/xdgmime/src/xdgmimecache.c and ThirdParty/xdgmime/src/xdgmimeglob.c.
CVE-2018-14404
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-19
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the xpath.c:xmlXPathCompOpEval() function of libxml2 through 2.9.8 when parsing an invalid XPath expression in the XPATH_OP_AND or XPATH_OP_OR case. Applications processing untrusted XSL format inputs with the use of the libxml2 library may be vulne...