News

10/14/2009
08:52 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Understanding Storage Controller Performance

Storage controllers are the engine that drives the storage system you own. They are essentially a compute engine for storage arrays. Understanding storage controller performance and what can impact storage controllers is an important step in the optimization of your storage environment. It is also something that many storage managers assume is good enough.

Storage controllers are the engine that drives the storage system you own. They are essentially a compute engine for storage arrays. Understanding storage controller performance and what can impact storage controllers is an important step in the optimization of your storage environment. It is also something that many storage managers assume is good enough.Storage controller's performance can be impacted by a host of circumstances. Today's storage systems are asked to do so much more than the first external SCSI arrays. First, they manage significantly more capacity and drive quantity. Capabilities like snapshots, replication and the RAID calculation all impact the storage controller. Further new features like thin provisioning are just adding to the problem. This is why so many storage systems hit maximum performance at about 1/2 the drive population than the brochure states.

Second, storage systems are no longer responsible for servicing the requests of a single server. In shared environments the storage controllers can be responding to dozens if not hundreds of attached servers and workstations. To compound the issue, many environments, thanks to server virtualization, will have multiple server instances making multiple storage I/O requests from a single host. This leads to extremely random and unpredictable workloads in the environment which can saturate controllers.

Today's storage controllers are responding to requests from more performance hungry servers that are attached to them. In web applications for example the storage may be responding to thousands of simultaneous users all accessing the same database or randomly each accessing different photos. Again, in virtualized server environments, these demands can come from 1,000 VMs spread out across a few hundred physical systems.

The classic dual controller architecture itself is misleading. In many cases both controllers are not equally handling the storage I/O for a given RAID volume. Usually one is assigned as the primary and the other as the secondary. The secondary is only used if the primary fails. The result is a single controller, handling all the above highly random conditions, can more realistically get saturated.

The classic response has been to overbuy storage compute muscle. The problem with this is that we all know that today's processors will be replaced by tomorrow's for less money. When you overbuy processing you are paying extra for compute muscle that you may not need until next year or later.

This has lead to some of the major manufacturers following the lead of a few storage innovators to start delivering clustered storage systems. Although how these clusters are assembled and the services they offer vary, they address the storage controller performance bottleneck that we detail in our article "What's Causing the Storage I/O Bottleneck?".

These systems allow continuous scale of capacity, I/O bandwidth as well as storage compute performance. Not every data center is going to encounter storage controller performance issues, and for those data centers standard systems are more than acceptable, but if your data center can cause any of the above conditions then storage controllers are something you need to pay attention to.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
To Be Ready for the Security Future, Pay Attention to the Security Past
Liz Maida, Co-founder, CEO & CTO, Uplevel Security,  9/18/2017
1.9 Billion Data Records Exposed in First Half of 2017
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/20/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Jan, check this out! I found an unhackable PC.
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
The Dark Reading Security Spending Survey
The Dark Reading Security Spending Survey
Enterprises are spending an unprecedented amount of money on IT security where does it all go? In this survey, Dark Reading polled senior IT management on security budgets and spending plans, and their priorities for the coming year. Download the report and find out what they had to say.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.