News
10/9/2009
10:06 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Understanding Storage Bandwidth Performance

Storage bandwidth is the connectivity between servers and the storage they are attached to. When it comes to understanding storage bandwidth performance you have two challenges to deal with. The first and most obvious is can the storage get the data to the application or user fast enough? The second and less obvious is can the applications and hardware those applications run on take advantage of that bandwidth?

Storage bandwidth is the connectivity between servers and the storage they are attached to. When it comes to understanding storage bandwidth performance you have two challenges to deal with. The first and most obvious is can the storage get the data to the application or user fast enough? The second and less obvious is can the applications and hardware those applications run on take advantage of that bandwidth?For most data centers we can get more than enough storage bandwidth performance. There is 8GB fibre, 10GB FCoE and 10GB Ethernet. The first step should be to make sure that the application can take advantage of that performance if you upgrade to it, if not then don't. This is one of the reasons why smaller environments are served just fine by iSCSI even on 1GB connections, for them that bandwidth is good enough.

Understanding the speed at which I/O is coming out of the server to the storage connection is key. Again as mentioned in our last entry, some of the built-in utilities with the OSs can give you this information. As the environment gets more complicated, server virtualization for example, then we suggest using tools that can give you a more accurate determination like those from Akorri, Virtual Instruments or Tek-Tools.

In addition to the application, you also need to examine the server hardware itself. Does it have the CPU power and memory size needed to get the data requests to and from the storage network? In most cases the chances are yes. If you have an application that needs high I/O you have already upgraded the server hardware.

In the case of virtualized server environments, can that storage bandwidth be channeled or better allocated? Server virtualization changes the rules. Instead of a single server accessing storage or the network through a single interface, now you have multiple servers all accessing storage simultaneously. As we discussed in our article "Why Quality of Service is Even More Important in a Virtual Environment", optimizing high bandwidth in virtual environments may be better served when priorities can be given to each virtual machine.

When it comes to I/O at the storage system most systems today have multiple connections leading up to the switch infrastructure, or in the case of clustered storage the connections to the switch infrastructure scale as more storage is added. It is important there is plenty of bandwidth to the storage controller since it is likely to receive storage requests from many servers and virtual machines simultaneously. Most storage managers overbuy on storage system bandwidth and it is typically not the primary issue in the performance loop.

The disadvantage to this is that you are often paying for bandwidth that you will never use or at least not until a future date. Ideally, you should be buying just the bandwidth you need today and then upgrading it when you need it. This is one of the deliverables of clustered storage systems like those from 3PAR, Isilon and HP's Lefthand Network's because bandwidth can grow as you need it, providing maximum flexibility and CAPEX optimization.

Clustered storage also plays a big role in addressing the next area of performance concern, the storage controller itself, which we will discuss in our next entry.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
The Impact of a Security Breach 2017
The Impact of a Security Breach 2017
Despite the escalation of cybersecurity staffing and technology, enterprises continue to suffer data breaches and compromises at an alarming rate. How do these breaches occur? How are enterprises responding, and what is the impact of these compromises on the business? This report offers new data on the frequency of data breaches, the losses they cause, and the steps that organizations are taking to prevent them in the future.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.