News
2/8/2010
04:14 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

The Importance Of QoS In Automated Tiering

In a conversation I had a few weeks ago with Pillar Data's CEO, Mike Workman, we discussed his recent blog entry on the "Auto Tiering of Data". In this blog he brings up several important considerations as vendors and users begin to examine automated tiering. One I'd like to elaborate on is QoS in Automated Tiering.

In a conversation I had a few weeks ago with Pillar Data's CEO, Mike Workman, we discussed his recent blog entry on the "Auto Tiering of Data". In this blog he brings up several important considerations as vendors and users begin to examine automated tiering. One I'd like to elaborate on is QoS in Automated Tiering.Quality of Service (QoS) of course has been with us in networks for a while. We have it enabled in IP routers, we are beginning to see it in network interface cards and now we are even seeing it in fibre channel networks with NPIV. Automate tiering now brings this to storage, where active data is automatically migrated up to faster storage, like SSD or even DRAM and inactive data is gradually migrated down to slower SATA based storage. This is a great start and compared to the alternative should provide a performance boost in almost every situation.

Merely identifying active data and moving it to a high performance tier is a brute force method that should eventually give way to a more intelligent method where possible. Just because data is active does not mean that it should go on the fastest and most expensive tier of storage. In most automated tiering environments the fast tier is going to be a finite repository and it may be impractical to keep all the active data on that tier. Really active but non-important data could prohibit slightly less active but important when accessed data from ever making it to the high speed tier.

What is needed is a more granular QoS capability in automated tiering systems. The ability to exclude or include data by type or location for example. Eventually these systems need to learn who the requester is. If it is from a small number of users on a relatively slow network connection, leave the data on mechanical storage. If the requester is an application or a high number of users then move the data up to the performance tier.

For the time being Solid State Disk and DRAM are finite resources. You want to make sure that you are not only putting active data on these tiers but data that can actually take advantage of the tier.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-4403
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Zen Cart 1.3.9h allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete a product via a delete_product_confirm action to product.php or (2) disable a product via a setflag action to categories.ph...

CVE-2012-2930
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in TinyWebGallery (TWG) before 1.8.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a user via an adduser action to admin/index.php or (2) conduct static PHP code injection attacks in .htusers...

CVE-2012-2932
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in TinyWebGallery (TWG) before 1.8.8 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) selitems[] parameter in a copy, (2) chmod, or (3) arch action to admin/index.php or (4) searchitem parameter in a search action to admin/...

CVE-2012-5451
Published: 2015-04-24
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in HttpUtils.dll in TVMOBiLi before 2.1.0.3974 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (tvMobiliService service crash) via a long string in a (1) GET or (2) HEAD request to TCP port 30888.

CVE-2015-0297
Published: 2015-04-24
Red Hat JBoss Operations Network 3.3.1 does not properly restrict access to certain APIs, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java methos via the (1) ServerInvokerServlet or (2) SchedulerService or (3) cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via the ContentManager.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.