News
4/30/2010
12:13 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Storage Checkers Vs. Chess

Checkers is a two dimensional game where all the pieces have the same ability. Its about covering space. Chess is a complex three dimensional game where all the pieces have different capabilities and there is one common target: the enemy's king. In storage some features begin to look like checkers because they have become so commonplace, but when you dig deeper you find that the capabilities of these features between vendors vary greatly.

Checkers is a two dimensional game where all the pieces have the same ability. Its about covering space. Chess is a complex three dimensional game where all the pieces have different capabilities and there is one common target: the enemy's king. In storage some features begin to look like checkers because they have become so commonplace, but when you dig deeper you find that the capabilities of these features between vendors vary greatly.A great example is snapshot technology. I would be hard pressed to name a storage system vendor or even an operating system that does not have the feature listed. If you have a checkers view of storage, covering the bases, then you will give the feature a check mark and move on. Reality is though that snapshot technology is still different between vendors. Many vendors still have a relatively small limit on the amount of snapshots that can be maintained per LUN or volume because of how the tracking and managing of snapshots will impact performance of the system. Even systems that have seemingly high snapshot limits really should be reviewed with close scrutiny. Thanks to server virtualization you can hit 200+ active snapshots per volume quickly.

Thin provisioning is another technology that seems headed toward the checker status that really should not be. There are still key differences in vendor offerings. The first is how the thin provisioning allocates storage. Many thinly provisioned systems are really just dynamically allocating chunks of capacity as the volumes they are monitoring reach their allocation limits. For example if you define a 1TB volume some systems will allocate volume to its capacity rather than chunks at a time instead of a very fine grained allocation. When this chunk is filled up another chunk is allocated. What this means is that for each volume there is capacity that is allocated and not in use. For some vendors this extra allocation can be quite large, and in a storage system with hundreds if not thousands of volumes it can result in a lot of wasted capacity.

Another key development in thin provisioning, as we outline in our Thin Provisioning White paper, is the ability to migrate from hard volumes to thin volumes as well as reclaim capacity on thin provisioned volumes after data has been deleted from them. These are still relatively new features. Most storage systems do not have it yet and they could be important, especially in larger data centers.

There are other features that are often assumed to be the same yet on further examination are very different between vendors. Capabilities like deduplication, auto-tiering, compression and replication are just a few, even basic capabilities like the actual provisioning of storage can be vastly different on further review. When considering your storage options make sure you are playing chess, not checkers.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-3304
Published: 2014-10-30
Directory traversal vulnerability in Dell EqualLogic PS4000 with firmware 6.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the default URI.

CVE-2013-7409
Published: 2014-10-30
Buffer overflow in ALLPlayer 5.6.2 through 5.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long string in a .m3u (playlist) file.

CVE-2014-3446
Published: 2014-10-30
SQL injection vulnerability in wcm/system/pages/admin/getnode.aspx in BSS Continuity CMS 4.2.22640.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the nodeid parameter.

CVE-2014-3584
Published: 2014-10-30
The SamlHeaderInHandler in Apache CXF before 2.6.11, 2.7.x before 2.7.8, and 3.0.x before 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted SAML token in the authorization header of a request to a JAX-RS service.

CVE-2014-3623
Published: 2014-10-30
Apache WSS4J before 1.6.17 and 2.x before 2.0.2, as used in Apache CXF 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2, when using TransportBinding, does properly enforce the SAML SubjectConfirmation method security semantics, which allows remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks via unspecified vect...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.