News

10/23/2009
10:35 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Reducing Storage Complexity In Server Virtualization

The storage component of a virtualized server infrastructure has been labeled as complex and expensive. In our prior entries about selecting a storage foundation we discussed what systems and protocols are available that might help simplify and reduce costs for storage in a virtualized environment. Beyond physi

The storage component of a virtualized server infrastructure has been labeled as complex and expensive. In our prior entries about selecting a storage foundation we discussed what systems and protocols are available that might help simplify and reduce costs for storage in a virtualized environment. Beyond physical hardware you need software tools that can link the abstract virtual machine to the physical storage.Storage and server virtualization suppliers have both tried to deliver products that reduce storage complexity in server virtualization projects. They have tried using different protocols, simplifying set up and extend integrating into the virtualization management console. At some point external tools are needed to do the heavy lifting. Companies like Vizioncore, Tek-Tools, Akorri and others provide software the makes the abstract to physical connection.

One of the first advantages of these tools is they allow the storage administrator to manage storage instead of the server virtualization administrator. Often in virtualization, the storage is assigned to the virtualization project and then it is managed outside of the normal storage best practices. Even in cases where the storage and servers are managed by the same person, the presentation of a unified view that these tools provide allows for predictive analysis and quicker problem resolution.

These tools then can provide capabilities like monitoring how specific virtual machines are using storage resources. In the shared file system world of server virtualization, often it is hard to know what virtual machines are using which LUNs or volumes. This makes it challenging to identify storage performance issues and often the storage manager is forced to upgrade performance across the board, even though there is just one virtual machine potentially causing the problem.

With these tools you can identify a storage I/O heavy virtual machine that is causing the other virtual machines to be starved out of storage I/O resources. Instead of applying an upgrade that applies to all the virtual machines, possibly that one virtual machine can be set on its own, potentially on higher performing storage or dedicated I/O bandwidth.

As we discuss in our article "Maximizing Your Server Virtualization Requires Understanding Its Storage", another key capability of these tools is to identify wasted space in virtual machine image files. The files created by virtualization templates often lead to massive storage waste. The template creates an image file at a default size, in most cases the default size is set at a "safe" capacity setting. The problem is that most of the virtual machines in the environment never come close to consuming that capacity. As a result, as the virtual environment grows, tens of TBs of storage capacity are wasted. These tools can help identify and correct those weaknesses.

Simplifying storage management in the server virtualization world requires connecting the abstract to the physical. While tools provided by both the storage and virtualization manufacturers have improved, the need for an external tool often provides better identification of potential problems as well as ongoing predictive analysis. They should be something that most IT organizations consider having on their utility belt.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
[Strategic Security Report] How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Problem
Enterprises are spending more of their IT budgets on cybersecurity technology. How do your organization's security plans and strategies compare to what others are doing? Here's an in-depth look.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.