News
8/15/2008
05:38 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Oh, Tier 3...

Remember about five years or so ago when life was simple? We had fast SCSI and Fibre Channel drives for data and we had tape for backup. Seemed perfect. Then came the ATA-based drives, and you were told to move your older data to them and start sending backups to disk. Then powering the data center and storage in particular became a problem; another use for ATA, put them in stand-by mode, spin them down, put them to sleep, and then eventually turn them off. As is usually the case, the hardware i

Remember about five years or so ago when life was simple? We had fast SCSI and Fibre Channel drives for data and we had tape for backup. Seemed perfect. Then came the ATA-based drives, and you were told to move your older data to them and start sending backups to disk. Then powering the data center and storage in particular became a problem; another use for ATA, put them in stand-by mode, spin them down, put them to sleep, and then eventually turn them off. As is usually the case, the hardware is ahead of the software and there's limited automation to leverage all of this, so what's a user to do?There are so many variations on Tier 3 that it's hard to categorize this entry and catch every permutation. First, what type of data should go on Tier 3? Ideally, everything that isn't currently being accessed (old data) or copies of current data where there is value in freezing the state of that data for some reason; for example, a database archive or a copy of a PowerPoint presentation that you are going to modify heavily. However, this data does NOT include backup data. That data needs to go on another disk tier: Tier 4. Tier 3, then, is essentially data at rest, but data that might need to be accessed in the future, so you want to keep it on a medium that can still deliver that data back to you in short order. The challenge has been to understand how the various manufacturers have responded to this market. One of the first incarnations and one of the most popular still today is manufacturers are just adding shelves with ATA drives to their existing systems or adding just an external box of cheap ATA RAID. Both of these strategies have limited value, unless you have a specific need for a scratch area or something of that nature. The exception being some storage systems that can auto-migrate old data blocks to this storage on an as-needed basis. If your storage system can't do this for you automatically, either change storage systems or don't use Tier 3 storage in this manner. Regardless of the capabilities of your Tier 1 or 2 offering, where things get interesting is with systems that are focusing specifically on the data-retention market. They address key requirements like portability, scalability, density, power management, data integrity, and cost efficiencies that the ATA in shelf solutions lack. By moving (not copying) data either manually or in an automated fashion, you can move this data off primary storage, while at the same time giving yourself a data vault. When I mention a data vault or retention, the first thought is usually compliance or litigation readiness. While these are important, think of the vault from another value ... assets. As the wealth of retained information grows and the ability to index its content improves year by year, data as an asset will be a key strategic initiative in many enterprises. The common requirement in data indexing will be the ability to access that data. What (if anything) you choose to index, the application today may be different than what you choose to index with tomorrow. Having that data stored in a simple open interface file system like CIFS or NFS will be critical. Next we will finish up our "Tour of Tiers" with Tier 4.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Must Reads - September 25, 2014
Dark Reading's new Must Reads is a compendium of our best recent coverage of identity and access management. Learn about access control in the age of HTML5, how to improve authentication, why Active Directory is dead, and more.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2003-1598
Published: 2014-10-01
SQL injection vulnerability in log.header.php in WordPress 0.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the posts variable.

CVE-2011-4624
Published: 2014-10-01
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in facebook.php in the GRAND FlAGallery plugin (flash-album-gallery) before 1.57 for WordPress allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the i parameter.

CVE-2012-0811
Published: 2014-10-01
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Postfix Admin (aka postfixadmin) before 2.3.5 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the pw parameter to the pacrypt function, when mysql_encrypt is configured, or (2) unspecified vectors that are used in backup files gene...

CVE-2014-2640
Published: 2014-10-01
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-2641
Published: 2014-10-01
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.4 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Chris Hadnagy, who hosts the annual Social Engineering Capture the Flag Contest at DEF CON, will discuss the latest trends attackers are using.