News
8/22/2008
09:45 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Migration Migraines

Moving data between tiers of storage has gotten easier as a result of global file systems and simplified archive software, but upgrading to a new platform ... that is just plain ugly.

Moving data between tiers of storage has gotten easier as a result of global file systems and simplified archive software, but upgrading to a new platform ... that is just plain ugly.When it is time to look at a new storage system for primary storage one of the top considerations is moving data to the new platform. As you can imagine, the more data there is the harder it is to move. This is not as simple as a copy and paste, which is not only the slowest possible method but also can play havoc on file security settings. This data has to be moved in such a way as to preserve file security attributes while at the same time optimizing performance. What are your options?

First, you can opt not to switch manufacturers at all. Many suppliers have the ability to do "data in place" upgrades between platforms. You simply connect the old storage shelves to the new storage controllers and start accessing data. Be careful, though. All is not as it would seem. Sometimes this transfer requires a maintenance window where applications need to be down. Also in some cases the older storage cannot benefit from the performance and enhancements the newer controllers may offer.

The big challenge, however, is that the shelf may not go all the way up the manufacturers product family. So, for example, if you purchase a midrange system and at some point need an enterprise system you may not be able to take your data with you … not by merely plugging it in, anyway.

If you do want to switch suppliers to get better performance, storage management capabilities, or price point, then you need to look at some sort of migration tool. A few manufacturers have the ability to support other manufacturer's storage and can absorb them into their environment. You need to be watchful here, too. First, you need to make sure how that absorption will work. In some cases, it may mean that the storage will be supported but the data needs to be reloaded. In others, it may mean that it can be supported and managed but none of the new software capabilities can be taken advantage of.

In many cases, if you are switching platforms you need to get a separate tool just to do the migration. Most of the storage manufacturers have either a specific tool or a professional service offering to help you with the migration. Negotiate this up front, these can be expensive "oopses" to miss. Other manufacturers like Incipient have optimized their storage management application to offer a subset of it that just does migration.

Part of the solution is to keep primary storage as small as possible -- yes, here I go on about archiving again. In the next entry, we will look at how archive can help with migration and how archives themselves need to handle migrations.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-0714
Published: 2015-05-02
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Finesse Server 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameters, aka Bug ID CSCut53595.

CVE-2014-3598
Published: 2015-05-01
The Jpeg2KImagePlugin plugin in Pillow before 2.5.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted image.

CVE-2014-8361
Published: 2015-05-01
The miniigd SOAP service in Realtek SDK allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted NewInternalClient request.

CVE-2015-0237
Published: 2015-05-01
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 ignores the permission to deny snapshot creation during live storage migration between domains, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (prevent host start) by creating a long snapshot chain.

CVE-2015-0257
Published: 2015-05-01
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 uses weak permissions on the directories shared by the ovirt-engine-dwhd service and a plugin during service startup, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading files in the directory.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.