News
10/16/2009
12:24 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Here Comes Automated Storage Tiering

At Storage Networking World, at least one new category in storage is coming to the forefront; Automated Storage Tiering. These are typically devices that can sit in front of your existing storage platform and allow some of it to leverage a high speed solid state front end without you manually having to move data to a Solid State Disk (SSD).

At Storage Networking World, at least one new category in storage is coming to the forefront; Automated Storage Tiering. These are typically devices that can sit in front of your existing storage platform and allow some of it to leverage a high speed solid state front end without you manually having to move data to a Solid State Disk (SSD).The companies in this space include Avere, Dataram, Gear6 and Storspeed. There are other forms of these products from Compellent and NetApp that either can do dynamic data placement or can provide a large SSD as a front end cache. These solutions however are limited to a single storage system and only work on the respective manufacturers products.

Integrating stand alone SSD or even SSD as a drive type in a storage system is achievable as we state in our recent article "Integrating SSD and Maintaining Disaster Recovery", but what if you don't have the time or what if your environment simply is too difficult to apply these procedures?

Automated Storage Tiering attempts to address the challenge of integration and provide increased optimization of tier 0 storage. After all if you are paying 15X the cost for your tier 0 storage, you don't want even 10% to be empty if you can avoid it.

The basic architecture behind automated tiering is to place the system inline between the storage and the servers. It then will act as a large, in some cases, giant, cache or I/O accelerator. Most of the systems today are DRAM based and then are adding flash SSD as a second tier. Typically the solutions will automatically cache reads and writes to the device. There are options for the storage manager to hard set or hard exclude certain data sets from the cache.

One of the differentiations between the automated tiering systems is going to be on protocol. Some will be block I/O focused and others network file system focused. The network file system storage devices may be able to provide greater analytics. There will also be debate around how the device is really used. Is the device a big cache that simply accelerates the current storage or is the device really a storage platform that leverages the legacy storage as the slowest tier in its available storage tiers?

Automated Storage Tiering is now a legitimate category. How we use this category to help IT to meet continuing storage I/O performance demands vs. some of the other options available to us is the next step.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Threat Intel Today
Threat Intel Today
The 397 respondents to our new survey buy into using intel to stay ahead of attackers: 85% say threat intelligence plays some role in their IT security strategies, and many of them subscribe to two or more third-party feeds; 10% leverage five or more.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3352
Published: 2014-08-30
Cisco Intelligent Automation for Cloud (aka Cisco Cloud Portal) 2008.3_SP9 and earlier does not properly consider whether a session is a problematic NULL session, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via crafted packets, related to an "iFrame vulnerability," aka Bug ID CSCuh...

CVE-2014-3908
Published: 2014-08-30
The Amazon.com Kindle application before 4.5.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

CVE-2010-5110
Published: 2014-08-29
DCTStream.cc in Poppler before 0.13.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PDF file.

CVE-2012-1503
Published: 2014-08-29
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Six Apart (formerly Six Apart KK) Movable Type (MT) Pro 5.13 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the comment section.

CVE-2013-5467
Published: 2014-08-29
Monitoring Agent for UNIX Logs 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP09, and 6.2.3 through FP04 and Monitoring Server (ms) and Shared Libraries (ax) 6.2.0 through FP03, 6.2.1 through FP04, 6.2.2 through FP08, 6.2.3 through FP01, and 6.3.0 through FP01 in IBM Tivoli Monitoring (ITM)...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
This episode of Dark Reading Radio looks at infosec security from the big enterprise POV with interviews featuring Ron Plesco, Cyber Investigations, Intelligence & Analytics at KPMG; and Chris Inglis & Chris Bell of Securonix.