Application Security
6/23/2010
06:23 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Wins Viacom Copyright Lawsuit

The ruling affirms the viability of sites that accept content from users.

Google has prevailed in the $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit brought against the company and YouTube in 2007 by Viacom.

A federal judge on Wednesday granted Google's motion for summary judgment, finding that the company had taken sufficient steps to deal with infringing content to meet the safe harbor requirements of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Google VP and general counsel Kent Walker characterized the decision as "an important victory not just for us, but also for the billions of people around the world who use the Web to communicate and share experiences with each other."

A spokesperson for Viacom wasn't immediately available.

In a statement obtained by The Wall Street Journal's All Things Digital Web site, Viacom promised to appeal the decision.

Viacom has maintained throughout the legal proceedings that Google executives knowingly allowed copyrighted content to persist on YouTube as a means of ensuring the site's popularity.

Eric Goldman, associate professor of Law at Santa Clara University School, said in a phone interview that Viacom's appeal could take years and until that time, "this becomes the latest high-water mark in user-caused copyright infringement cases."

In an analysis of the decision posted on his blog, Goldman says that the ruling endorses industry-standard takedown practices and frustrates efforts by content owners to narrow DMCA safe harbor protections.

Online companies accused of copyright infringement as a result of actions by their users will be able to point to this decision to bolster their defense.

The Google-Viacom decision stands in stark contrast to an Italian court's ruling in February that found fault with Google's video takedown procedures. A judge in Milan convicted three Google executives of privacy law violations for failing to quickly remove an offensive video posted to YouTube's Italian site.

Google called that decision "deeply troubling" and is appealing.

Though the Italian case involves privacy rather than copyright law, both cases raise questions about the amount of vigilance that Internet content hosts are expected to exercise over user-submitted content.

In the U.S. at least, Google and its services that involve user-submitted content now look to be on more stable legal footing.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Five Things Every Business Executive Should Know About Cybersecurity
Don't get lost in security's technical minutiae - a clearer picture of what's at stake can help align business imperatives with technology execution.
Flash Poll
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Social engineering, ransomware, and other sophisticated exploits are leading to new IT security compromises every day. Dark Reading's 2016 Strategic Security Survey polled 300 IT and security professionals to get information on breach incidents, the fallout they caused, and how recent events are shaping preparations for inevitable attacks in the coming year. Download this report to get a look at data from the survey and to find out what a breach might mean for your organization.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Security researchers are finding that there's a growing market for the vulnerabilities they discover and persistent conundrum as to the right way to disclose them. Dark Reading editors will speak to experts -- Veracode CTO and co-founder Chris Wysopal and HackerOne co-founder and CTO Alex Rice -- about bug bounties and the expanding market for zero-day security vulnerabilities.