Vulnerabilities / Threats // Insider Threats
4/24/2012
02:18 PM
Eric Zeman
Eric Zeman
Commentary
50%
50%

Google Drive: Hands-On Winner

Google's new online storage service represents the natural evolution of Google Docs, and another transformation for the world of collaborative file management.

Google launched Google Drive, its new cloud-based file storage, management, and sharing service, Tuesday. It offers 5 GB of data storage for free and significantly more if you're willing to pony up some cash each month. It supports 30 different file types and a number of mobile and desktop platforms. Google Drive isn't exactly unique, however, and competitors Dropbox, Box, iCloud, SkyDrive, and others offer similar features sets. What makes Google Drive different or better than the rest, and who will benefit from it the most?

I've used Google Docs every day for more than five years. Its online document and sharing/collaboration tools are an essential element to my workflow. Considering how many governments and business have "gone Google," I am surely not the only one who's come to rely on Google Docs.

Tuesday's introduction of Google Drive is more a revamp of Google Docs than it is a brand new service. Essentially, Google is rebranding Google Docs to Google Drive, and modifying its user interface to suit a bunch of new features.

Docs already lets users create documents, spreadsheets, and other files. Those files could be edited, shared, downloaded, uploaded, and so on. None of that has changed, only now Docs, er, Drive users have a minimum of 5 GB of storage of which to make use. There are a few key differences, however, that dramatically improve the usefulness of the whole shebang.

[ Learn more about Google's new cloud storage service. See Google Drive Arrives, At Last. ]

In addition to the browser-based user interface and file access, Google has developed dedicated applications for the Android, Windows, and OS X platforms (an iOS app is on the way). These apps give PC and smartphone/tablet users instant access to their files and will automatically upload, download, and sync them across multiple devices types.

I downloaded and installed the Google Drive app on two different Macs, an Android tablet, and an Android smartphone. On the Macs, I was able to download and sync all my Google Docs files to a local "Google Drive" folder. Want to make a file on your desktop available to your smartphone? Easy, just drag and drop it into the Google Drive file and it syncs across the 'Net where it can be accessed on the smartphone. Dropbox handles this same feature very well.

The real killer feature is search. You've always been able to search through Google Docs, but the new tools available in Google Drive let users sort among file types, file owners, file visibility, and so on. Being able to specify searches just for PDFs or presentation files can really help narrow down results and speed up the searching process.

Perhaps what's more enjoyable than easy file syncing, though, is easy file sharing. I'm not talking about sending a spreadsheet to your boss. I'm talking about social networks and other services such as Google+. Sending files, such as photos, from Google Drive to Google+ or Picasa is a breeze. It's also a snap to send files, including music tracks, documents, or photos, from an Android device to the online drive.

Who will benefit most from Google Drive? The service is clearly meant for use by consumers and not necessarily the enterprise, where intranets are the norm for file storage, management, and sharing. Small businesses that can't afford to purchase intricate database systems can reap plenty of rewards from the simplicity offered by Google Drive.

Will Google Drive replace the services it acts to mimic? Probably some of them. It's one thing to be able to swap files from device to device, but something else to create, share, and collaborate on files with coworkers or others. For organizations or individuals who don't need the powerful document tools, sticking with services such as Dropbox or Box will make sense. Any business invested in Google's services and Google Docs should look seriously at Google Drive.

As companies increase their use of cloud-based applications, IT and security professionals must make some tough and far-reaching decisions about how to provision, deprovision, and otherwise manage user access. This Dark Reading report, How To Manage Identity In The Public Cloud, examines the options and provides recommendations for determining which one is right for your organization. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
ajones980
50%
50%
ajones980,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:04:35 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
I'm confused as to how "Google Drive: Hands-On Winner" came out as the headline for this article. I've been looking at Skydrive today, and it seems to have comparable features to Google Drive - document editing and creation, easy sharing between web, phone, PC, Mac, iPad (oh, wait, Google doesn't have that), search into the documents you've stored there, blah blah blah. OK, sure, if you're "invested in Google's services and Google Docs", Skydrive loses out - but then, if you're "invested in Microsoft's services, and Office documents", Skydrive beats Google Drive hands down.
This story seems to be summed up as "I like Google Docs, and the new update and rename are an improvement, so I'm comfortable not paying any attention to competing services". While that's a win for Google's customer retention, it's a little strange to tout this as a comparative win against those other services.
Couple this with Skydrive's base 7GB free service, and the recent announcement of a short-term offer to provide 25GB free service (the offer is short term, not the service), and I'm really quite at a loss to understand the point of this article, other than "we received a press release from Google, reworded it so that it sounded like our words, and then published it, without bothering to do any extra work of our own."
standup75
50%
50%
standup75,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:10:45 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Hands-On Winner for the most evil terms of services: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/...
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:21:56 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
I think Eric is pretty clear that he's a Google Docs enthusiast and sees this as most valuable for people who would appreciate this file service as part of the whole Google Apps suite. He doesn't pretend to provide a feature-by-feature comparison with every file sharing service out there.

In the accompanying news story, we did point out that some other services are offering more free storage.
MikeZa
50%
50%
MikeZa,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:26:28 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
I fail to see how you dont seem to understand that this is his experiance with Google Drive. Not a 'you should buy this over that' review.

Unfortunately you come across as a Microsoft Fanboy.
krischej
50%
50%
krischej,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:35:34 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Any honest review of Google Drive must, IMHO, mention the horrible Terms of Service... you did read them, right? I could never use G-Drive no matter how whizz-bang the feature set is because of this startling bit from the ToS:

"When you upload or otherwise submit content to our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content."

So, don't put up anything on G-Drive you wouldn't be comfortable putting on a billboard in every city of every country, in every language, search indexed. I certainly wouldn't put up any sensitive business, deeply personal or financial info, which pretty much rules out anything you'd actually want to use G-Drive for, I would think, no?
ashraftm
50%
50%
ashraftm,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:37:10 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
IMO storage is not specific to any particular application. SkyDrive provides 25 GB compare to 5 GB Google space. SkyDrive integrated in to Windows Phone 7 and Windows 8 so copying files to cloud is a snap.
pgouldsw1
50%
50%
pgouldsw1,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 2:58:09 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Check the T&C's you might not be so enthusiastic!
ansarmoh
50%
50%
ansarmoh,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 3:03:57 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Actually, the author of this article comes across as a Google fanboy.

I own an Android phone and an Android tablet but I agree 100% with ajones980! SkyDrive gave me 25 GB free and its features are comparable to Google Drive (granted it is yet to arrive on Android). Google Drive gives me only 5GB. I am not claiming one is better than the other but the author failed to convince me to even sign up with Google Drive. I fail to understand how it is a "hands-on winner".

The author made an absolute claim that Google Drive is the winner without backing it up. Poor judgement, even worse poor articulation. I want the last 3 minutes of my life back.
mwatterud486
50%
50%
mwatterud486,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 3:17:56 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Make sure you read the terms of use. My interpretation is that once you load it to Google Drive, they have rights to it, even after you halt the service. Make sure you read. I will continue to use services where I retain the rights and control of my information.
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/25/2012 | 5:48:03 PM
re: Google Drive: Hands-On Winner
Many readers have raised questions about Google's terms of service. However, as the TechDirt blog points out "this piece of legal lingo doesn't come from the Google Drive terms of service, but from Google's overall terms for all their services. Meaning it already applies to everything from Gmail to Google Mars" - see http://www.techdirt.com/articl...

In other words, if you use Gmail or Google Docs, you've been living under these terms for some time. Google apparently intends for this language to apply primarily to its consumer properties, and it makes other commitments for specific services and to its paying Google Apps customers that probably override this.

I agree they ought to spell that out clearly, however.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading, January 2015
To find and fix exploits aimed directly at your business, stop waiting for alerts and become a proactive hunter.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3580
Published: 2014-12-18
The mod_dav_svn Apache HTTPD server module in Apache Subversion 1.x before 1.7.19 and 1.8.x before 1.8.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and server crash) via a REPORT request for a resource that does not exist.

CVE-2014-6076
Published: 2014-12-18
IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site.

CVE-2014-6077
Published: 2014-12-18
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences.

CVE-2014-6078
Published: 2014-12-18
IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 do not have a lockout period after invalid login attempts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain admin access via a brute-force attack.

CVE-2014-6080
Published: 2014-12-18
SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Security Access Manager for Mobile 8.x before 8.0.1 and Security Access Manager for Web 7.x before 7.0.0 FP10 and 8.x before 8.0.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.