News
7/9/2009
02:22 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

EMC Acquires Data Domain For $2.4 Billion

With businesses storing 50% more data each year, EMC is betting companies will line up for its combined data archival and de-duplication offering.

When Data Domain agreed to be acquired by NetApp for $1.5 billion in May, the storage company may have undervalued itself by nearly $1 billion. Competing bidder EMC agreed this week to buy the deduplication specialist for $2.4 billion.

EMC is paying cash for Data Domain, the preferred currency over stock in these days of economic recession. NetApp's first offer for Data Domain was for $1.5 billion in cash and stock. After a few weeks of spirited bidding, NetApp dropped out of the competition.

With businesses storing 50% more data each year, according to some market research estimates, EMC is betting the acquisition will pay off. EMC said it expects the acquisition to be accretive to its non-GAAP earnings in its 2010 fiscal year.

"This is a compelling acquisition from both a strategic and financial standpoint," said Joe Tucci, EMC chairman, president, and CEO, in a statement. "We look forward to bringing Data Domain together with EMC to form a powerful force in next-generation disk-based backup and archive."

With government regulations and legal measures continuing to grow, deduplication's reduction of redundant data is becoming more important. EMC has some deduplication technology in place, but its acquisition of Data Domain and its deduplication offerings will help give it a leg up in the storage segment. While tape storage is still in widespread use, chief information officers increasingly want the speedy access offered by spinning disks and other disk storage technologies. Deduplication is helping in the shift from tape to disk backup and archive storage.

EMC said the acquisition, which is expected to be completed later this month, is expected to have a total enterprise value of $2.1 billion, net of Data Domain's cash.


InformationWeek Analytics has published an independent analysis on the state of enterprise storage. Download the report here (registration required).

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
DevOps’ Impact on Application Security
Managing the interdependency between software and infrastructure is a thorny challenge. Often, it’s a “developers are from Mars, systems engineers are from Venus” situation.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-6117
Published: 2014-07-11
Dahua DVR 2.608.0000.0 and 2.608.GV00.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and obtain sensitive information including user credentials, change user passwords, clear log files, and perform other actions via a request to TCP port 37777.

CVE-2014-0174
Published: 2014-07-11
Cumin (aka MRG Management Console), as used in Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.5, does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header for the session cookie, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information via script access to this cookie.

CVE-2014-3485
Published: 2014-07-11
The REST API in the ovirt-engine in oVirt, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (rhevm) 3.4, allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files and have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue.

CVE-2014-3499
Published: 2014-07-11
Docker 1.0.0 uses world-readable and world-writable permissions on the management socket, which allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3503
Published: 2014-07-11
Apache Syncope 1.1.x before 1.1.8 uses weak random values to generate passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password via a brute force attack.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marilyn Cohodas and her guests look at the evolving nature of the relationship between CIO and CSO.