News
6/8/2010
10:25 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Does Deduplication Make Storage Capacity Planning Difficult?

With all the technologies out now, and it not just deduplication, to optimize the use of primary storage capacity, the guidelines for how you estimate how much capacity you need in a given year needs to change. In some ways storage capacity planning is more difficult than it has been in the past. It has to change to keep up with the new capabilities of storage systems like thin provisioning, compression and deduplication.

With all the technologies out now, and it not just deduplication, to optimize the use of primary storage capacity, the guidelines for how you estimate how much capacity you need in a given year needs to change. In some ways storage capacity planning is more difficult than it has been in the past. It has to change to keep up with the new capabilities of storage systems like thin provisioning, compression and deduplication.Storage capacity planning of a few years ago seems like a relatively simple task compared with the capacity planning of today. You estimated the amount of capacity that you were going to need based on organic growth and new application needs, then doubled that number and ordered the storage. In many cases no one batted an eye to the process. If you apply that same logic today you may end of with 50% or more of your capacity purchase never being used. In fact several vendors are claiming, and even guaranteeing, that you will need less storage if you replace your current storage solution with theirs.

You could continue to use the old math when calculating storage capacity needs and enjoy all the extra free capacity. It is important to remember though that storage is not wine, it does not get more expensive with age, unused capacity is wasted budget dollars as well as power and cooling. The time has come to factor all these techniques into your next capacity or even storage system upgrade. Of these capabilities deduplication, compression and thin provisioning probably will have the most impact.

Primary storage deduplication has been discounted by some in the industry. There are concerns about performance impact and data integrity; both those concerns are technology issues and either are or will be overcome. Some solutions are now claiming micro seconds of latency and not altering the data format. The other and more legitimate concern is how much duplicate data do you really have on primary storage. In the past I would say this is a valid concern, until server and desktop virtualization. Now there can be TB's and TB's of redundant data on the system. Deduplication can address that problem and result in massive savings. Estimating how much deduplication should factor into your capacity planning is difficult. If the environment is going to be heavy on the virtualization side, I would suggest at least a 3:1 reduction in the amount of storage you were going to purchase maybe more.

Compression is another optimization technique to consider. Compression gains optimization across almost all files, it does not require duplicate data. The data does need to be compressible of course but in almost every case the net is at least a 2:1 gain. In most cases compression is not an inhibitor to deduplication, most of the solutions work together, some are even integrated.

Thin provisioning helps in an area that deduplication and compression do not, capacity that is allocated but not in use. Essentially storage that is captive to a particular server. You can't compress or deduplicate something that is not there. The only way to optimize this capacity is to free it from being bound to a particular server. As we discuss in our Thin Provisioning White Paper, the technology is no longer limited to optimizing new application deployment but also to ongoing application use. Modern thin provisioning technology can reclaim deleted space from volumes as well.

In our next entry we will discuss how to roll all this information together to plan your next capacity upgrade or to plan a new storage system purchase.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading, September 16, 2014
Malicious software is morphing to be more targeted, stealthy, and destructive. Are you prepared to stop it?
Flash Poll
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Title Partner’s Role in Perimeter Security
Considering how prevalent third-party attacks are, we need to ask hard questions about how partners and suppliers are safeguarding systems and data.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2942
Published: 2014-09-22
Cobham Aviator 700D and 700E satellite terminals use an improper algorithm for PIN codes, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain a privileged terminal session by calculating the superuser code, and then leveraging physical access or terminal access to enter this code.

CVE-2014-5522
Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6025. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6025. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6025 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to pre...

CVE-2014-5523
Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-5524. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-5524. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-5524 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent acciden...

CVE-2014-5575
Published: 2014-09-22
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.

CVE-2014-5665
Published: 2014-09-22
The Mzone Login (aka com.mr384.MzoneLogin) application 1.2.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio