News

5/7/2009
01:59 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

DAS VS. SAN - Capacity And Performance Management

Capacity presents two challenges to the Storage Area Network (SAN) vs. Direct Attached Storage (DAS) debate. A traditional knock against DAS and a reason that many data centers get a SAN is because of these two capacity challenges. The first is can you get enough capacity and the second is can you use that capacity efficiently in a performance sensitive environment? DAS however now has the ability to address both of these issues.

Capacity presents two challenges to the Storage Area Network (SAN) vs. Direct Attached Storage (DAS) debate. A traditional knock against DAS and a reason that many data centers get a SAN is because of these two capacity challenges. The first is can you get enough capacity and the second is can you use that capacity efficiently in a performance sensitive environment? DAS however now has the ability to address both of these issues.Typically there are three types of storage needs in primary storage. The first is very high performance, relatively small capacity for specific applications; a database application or messaging system are good examples. The second is high capacity with modest performance for a mixed workload type of server such as a virtualization host. The third is very high capacity with relatively low performance, it does not need to be to the capacity level that a disk archive or backup tier would be but it does need reasonable capacity; a home directory server is a good example.

The first type, high performance, low capacity has been the hardest to configure efficiently. Performance is certainly there. I recently sat in on an LSI Corporation demonstration that showed 1 million+ IO's performance with 6Gb's Serial Attached SCSI on an Intel based server running Windows. This low cost performance is part of the reason for DAS's resurgence.

However the challenge as we touched on in our last entry is getting this performance while at the same time using the capacity efficiently. These systems will certainly be configured with multiple drives to increase performance and to protect against drive failure. The problem comes in using that space efficiently. While small drives can still be purchased, the price per GB is not as attractive as a larger capacity drive and as a result you end up wasting capacity because in a DAS environment this capacity can not be shared with other servers.

DAS's lack of efficiency is further exposed by the fact that shared storage systems from companies like 3PAR, Xiotech and DataCore are becoming increasingly efficient through the use of thin provisioning or automated provisioning. As we describe in our article Converting from Fat Volumes to Thin Provisioning, now these companies are making the conversion to thin provisioning efficient as well so old volumes can start out thin when you upgrade to new storage platforms.

In addition SAN based systems are now virtualizing the spindles behind the array so all of the available mechanisms can be used to get maximum performance from the array as we detailed in a blog last year entitled Wide Stripping. Obviously SSD systems can be used and shared in this environment as well for the ultimate in performance focused capacity.

SSD in the form of PCI-E cards like those from Texas Memory Systems and Fusion-io may also be an option for a performance vs. efficiency problem with DAS and may be a viable stop gap on the way to a SAN for many IT departments. This cards allows you to bring RAID like protection with SSD performance at a relatively low cost and in fact may be less expensive than a performance configured RAID set. Factor in the power efficiencies of SSD and the case becomes more compelling. If storage IO performance problems are plaguing just a few of your servers, it may be more cost effective to investigate PCI-E based SSD, especially if you don't have a SAN already.

You can reach new levels of performance with DAS today, the decision to be made is if its enough performance and can you either efficiently use the capacity of that storage or can you justify wasting the extra capacity, keeping in mind that power and cooling of those drives needs to be factored into the equation.

In our next entry we will look at how DAS can address the challenges of achieving large capacity storage in a single server.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
More Than Half of Users Reuse Passwords
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  5/24/2018
Is Threat Intelligence Garbage?
Chris McDaniels, Chief Information Security Officer of Mosaic451,  5/23/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-11505
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-26
The Werewolf Online application 0.8.8 for Android allows attackers to discover the Firebase token by reading logcat output.
CVE-2018-6409
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-26
An issue was discovered in Appnitro MachForm before 4.2.3. The module in charge of serving stored files gets the path from the database. Modifying the name of the file to serve on the corresponding ap_form table leads to a path traversal vulnerability via the download.php q parameter.
CVE-2018-6410
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-26
An issue was discovered in Appnitro MachForm before 4.2.3. There is a download.php SQL injection via the q parameter.
CVE-2018-6411
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-26
An issue was discovered in Appnitro MachForm before 4.2.3. When the form is set to filter a blacklist, it automatically adds dangerous extensions to the filters. If the filter is set to a whitelist, the dangerous extensions can be bypassed through ap_form_elements SQL Injection.
CVE-2018-11500
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-26
An issue was discovered in PublicCMS V4.0.20180210. There is a CSRF vulnerability in "admin/sysUser/save.do?callbackType=closeCurrent&navTabId=sysUser/list" that can add an admin account.