News

2/25/2009
06:40 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Better Storage Practices To Improve Backup

Backup is the thorn in the side of many otherwise smoothly running IT operations. There is probably little coincidence that the newest hire is almost always assigned the backup process or the ramification for missing the assignments meeting. The truth is that backup should be simple -- all you're doing is copying data to tape. The problem in general has nothing to do with the backup process, it has more to do with how primary storage is managed and optimized.

Backup is the thorn in the side of many otherwise smoothly running IT operations. There is probably little coincidence that the newest hire is almost always assigned the backup process or the ramification for missing the assignments meeting. The truth is that backup should be simple -- all you're doing is copying data to tape. The problem in general has nothing to do with the backup process, it has more to do with how primary storage is managed and optimized.The primary problem is size; there is too much data, too much that is stagnant and unchanging. All of this unchanged data has to traverse most often the standard IP network or, best case, a SAN. While disk backup targets, especially those with data deduplication, help to optimally store this backup data, it really doesn't fix the problem at its source.

Fixing problems at the source is where you can derive the most improvement for the least investment. For example, look at real-time compression products like those from Storwize. These solutions compress file-based data in place and, in most cases, achieve better than 60% reduction of data. For user access, data is compressed and decompressed on the fly transparently, with little, if any, performance impacts. The backup application can access the compressed data in its compressed format, effectively cutting in half the amount of data to transport across the network and subsequently stored on backup disk and/or backup tape. Interesting that these inline compression appliances are compatible with deduplication appliances and actually improve their effective reduction rates.

The next step is to look into software that will reduce the amount of data sent across the network in the first place. The source-side reduction backup applications can either perform deduplication like EMC's Avamar or block-level incremental backups like SyncSort's Backup Express. While deduplication has the advantage of maximum backup disk storage optimization, block-level incremental technology (BLI) creates a backup volume that can be utilized for other purposes because it itself is a readable file system. Also, BLI has less impact on the server being protected, making more frequent backups more practical.

Finally, it makes sense to archive all this stagnant data off primary storage. Most studies indicate that more than 80% of this data can be archived and moved out of the backup process in its entirety. Using disk archive products like those from Permabit, NexSAN, or Copan Systems can be more aggressive than with tape-based systems, causing a dramatic reduction in your investment in primary storage and power costs.

Getting data to this archive can be as simple as using an operating systems move command to get the data to it. In our next entry we will look at a new technique, an optimized move.

View our Webcast on Primary Storage Optimization to learn more.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
BlueBorne Attack Highlights Flaws in Linux, IoT Security
Kelly Sheridan, Associate Editor, Dark Reading,  12/14/2017
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2017
A look at the biggest news stories (so far) of 2017 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape -- from Russian hacking, ransomware's coming-out party, and voting machine vulnerabilities to the massive data breach of credit-monitoring firm Equifax.
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Cloud Security's Changing Landscape
[Strategic Security Report] Cloud Security's Changing Landscape
Cloud services are increasingly becoming the platform for mission-critical apps and data. Heres how enterprises are adapting their security strategies!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.