News
2/25/2009
06:40 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Better Storage Practices To Improve Backup

Backup is the thorn in the side of many otherwise smoothly running IT operations. There is probably little coincidence that the newest hire is almost always assigned the backup process or the ramification for missing the assignments meeting. The truth is that backup should be simple -- all you're doing is copying data to tape. The problem in general has nothing to do with the backup process, it has more to do with how primary storage is managed and optimized.

Backup is the thorn in the side of many otherwise smoothly running IT operations. There is probably little coincidence that the newest hire is almost always assigned the backup process or the ramification for missing the assignments meeting. The truth is that backup should be simple -- all you're doing is copying data to tape. The problem in general has nothing to do with the backup process, it has more to do with how primary storage is managed and optimized.The primary problem is size; there is too much data, too much that is stagnant and unchanging. All of this unchanged data has to traverse most often the standard IP network or, best case, a SAN. While disk backup targets, especially those with data deduplication, help to optimally store this backup data, it really doesn't fix the problem at its source.

Fixing problems at the source is where you can derive the most improvement for the least investment. For example, look at real-time compression products like those from Storwize. These solutions compress file-based data in place and, in most cases, achieve better than 60% reduction of data. For user access, data is compressed and decompressed on the fly transparently, with little, if any, performance impacts. The backup application can access the compressed data in its compressed format, effectively cutting in half the amount of data to transport across the network and subsequently stored on backup disk and/or backup tape. Interesting that these inline compression appliances are compatible with deduplication appliances and actually improve their effective reduction rates.

The next step is to look into software that will reduce the amount of data sent across the network in the first place. The source-side reduction backup applications can either perform deduplication like EMC's Avamar or block-level incremental backups like SyncSort's Backup Express. While deduplication has the advantage of maximum backup disk storage optimization, block-level incremental technology (BLI) creates a backup volume that can be utilized for other purposes because it itself is a readable file system. Also, BLI has less impact on the server being protected, making more frequent backups more practical.

Finally, it makes sense to archive all this stagnant data off primary storage. Most studies indicate that more than 80% of this data can be archived and moved out of the backup process in its entirety. Using disk archive products like those from Permabit, NexSAN, or Copan Systems can be more aggressive than with tape-based systems, causing a dramatic reduction in your investment in primary storage and power costs.

Getting data to this archive can be as simple as using an operating systems move command to get the data to it. In our next entry we will look at a new technique, an optimized move.

View our Webcast on Primary Storage Optimization to learn more.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-9710
Published: 2015-05-27
The Btrfs implementation in the Linux kernel before 3.19 does not ensure that the visible xattr state is consistent with a requested replacement, which allows local users to bypass intended ACL settings and gain privileges via standard filesystem operations (1) during an xattr-replacement time windo...

CVE-2014-9715
Published: 2015-05-27
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h in the netfilter subsystem in the Linux kernel before 3.14.5 uses an insufficiently large data type for certain extension data, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and OOPS) via outbound network traffic that trig...

CVE-2015-1157
Published: 2015-05-27
CoreText in Apple iOS 8.x through 8.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot and messaging disruption) via crafted Unicode text that is not properly handled during display truncation in the Notifications feature, as demonstrated by Arabic characters in (1) an SMS message or (2)...

CVE-2015-2666
Published: 2015-05-27
Stack-based buffer overflow in the get_matching_model_microcode function in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c in the Linux kernel before 4.0 allows context-dependent attackers to gain privileges by constructing a crafted microcode header and leveraging root privileges for write access to t...

CVE-2015-2830
Published: 2015-05-27
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S in the Linux kernel before 3.19.2 does not prevent the TS_COMPAT flag from reaching a user-mode task, which might allow local users to bypass the seccomp or audit protection mechanism via a crafted application that uses the (1) fork or (2) close system call, as demonstrate...

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
After a serious cybersecurity incident, everyone will be looking to you for answers -- but you’ll never have complete information and you’ll never have enough time. So in those heated moments, when a business is on the brink of collapse, how will you and the rest of the board room executives respond?