News
7/28/2008
01:06 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Beating Up Storage Vendors

An analyst firm recently published a report suggesting that the No. 1 priority in reducing IT costs was to beat up your storage vendor for lower costs. I would like to give a dissenting opinion.

An analyst firm recently published a report suggesting that the No. 1 priority in reducing IT costs was to beat up your storage vendor for lower costs. I would like to give a dissenting opinion.First, let me say that I am all for people paying a fair price for the products they purchase. That said, it has been my experience that more often than not, when a customer has received the "deal of a lifetime" from a vendor, it often left something to be desired. I don't know if it is bad karma, gremlins, or something else, but it also seems that very often something goes wrong with these systems and they never really quite work right. There is a never-ending stream of problems, and the solution never seems to fly just right. Even if the vendor is able to pull a rabbit out of the hat, often confidence in the solution is lost and it is never trusted fully to move the solution into full production. In that case no one wins. The customer never experiences the full capabilities of the solution and never sees the real return on investment. The supplier has either a limited opportunity or none at all to expand the solution and sell additional product.

I think what often works is when a customer specifically looks to establish a partnership with the supplier based on trust and a fair amount of instinct. That instinct will often lead to a supplier that values that kind of relationship and is culturally able to reciprocate. The result is the customer may not have received the lowest price ever on the solution. Typically if the customer paid more, it is not by much. The market is just too competitive now and those forces tend to keep everything within percentages of each other for similar solutions. Interestingly, these installations tend to have a much higher degree of success, and even when problems arise they are handled quickly and professionally.

Playing hardball with a vendor means that someone has to win and someone has to lose. In fact, the very term hardball when used in this context implies that someone loses badly. I suggest another game: tic-tac-toe. This game you play to a tie or everyone wins.

Certainly when looking at a new storage solution or even upgrading an old one, you should look at other suppliers and options. This does keep everyone honest. Decide up front that you are not going to demand the best price ever offered or even that you are going to buy from the cheapest vendor. Most if not every supplier that I deal with is not out to get anyone or to try to sneak something by someone. Suppliers really do want to solve your problems, and most of them really do believe that they can do it. Your job is to figure out which one really can help you solve the problem and who will be with you throughout.

What is best way to do this? Once you have your short list of solutions, you should consider reaching out to people who are really using that product. Don't ask for references. Anyone can get a few people to say something nice about them. Do everything you can to find them on your own. While not foolproof, your chances of getting the unfiltered reality becomes much higher at that point. E-mail us, we'll connect you.

Second is test the final two or three solutions in as near to production simulation as you possibly can. I have seen too many instances where a customer buys a solution without testing it completely. If you are going to buy a SAN because you want to boot from it, then make sure you test that capability on each candidate. You might be surprised by the differences; even if the vendor says it can do it, the capability may be significantly easier on one platform vs. another.

Finally, give it the BBQ test. No, don't throw it on hot coals to get the best price. Assess the local team, salesperson, and engineer -- they are your best eyes into an organization. Would you invite them over for a BBQ? Is that true of everyone in the organization you meet? Oddly, I find that when I like a supplier, I like 99.9% of the people within that organization, and when I struggle with a supplier I find it difficult to work with more than half of them.

At the end of the day, your goal is to get a solution that solves a business problem and delivers a return on investment over a period of time. That means you are going to end up working together for quite some time, so having someone that you can get along with and know will help you work through problems, which is priceless.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: No, you were supposed to display UNICODE characters!
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
As cyber attackers become more sophisticated and enterprise defenses become more complex, many enterprises are faced with a complicated question: what is the risk of an IT security breach? This report delivers insight on how today's enterprises evaluate the risks they face. This report also offers a look at security professionals' concerns about a wide variety of threats, including cloud security, mobile security, and the Internet of Things.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.