News

1/13/2011
03:13 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Backup Deduplication 2.0 - Integration

Deduplication has moved from a risky hard to explain technology to one that is almost expected by customers from a disk backup device. Next generation backup deduplication systems are going to require a new set of capabilities to make them more than just disk backup. They will have to integrate with the backup software, begin to provide power management, and there needs to be a greater focus on recovery performance.

Deduplication has moved from a risky hard to explain technology to one that is almost expected by customers from a disk backup device. Next generation backup deduplication systems are going to require a new set of capabilities to make them more than just disk backup. They will have to integrate with the backup software, begin to provide power management, and there needs to be a greater focus on recovery performance.Deduplication can now be delivered as either stand alone hardware or as a module to the backup software. In general a hardware appliance should have the advantage of being more globally useful, meaning you can send backup data streams from a variety of backup sources. Not only specific backup software but also dump commands within applications. The challenge is that in most cases the software has no idea what is going on behind the scenes, including when that data is being replicated or how to use that replicated data. Software deduplication, delivered as part of a module within a backup software application, has the advantage of a tighter integration. In other words the backup application knows that data is being deduped and should be able to leverage that fact.

Hardware deduplication vendors though are quickly embracing available API sets to integrate with backup applications. The most notable example today is Symantec's OpenStorage API that we detailed a while back in "A Backup API". With a backup API in place, hardware vendors can integrate with the backup application to improve performance and allow operations like replication to be controlled through the backup GUI instead of it having to be a separate process controlled through the backup appliance GUI.

Simple integration is just the beginning. As we discussed in our recent article "Integrating Disk Backup With Backup Software" we are beginning to see backup hardware suppliers create specific modules that will increase their integration capabilities with software, even if that software does not have a formal API set. We are also seeing some vendors provide backup application specific modules that can increase performance by offloading some of the data that needs to be processed by the deduplication system. In essence dividing the load up between the backup server and the disk backup appliance. We expect to see this trend continue.

Another challenge with backup deduplication hardware is power and space efficiency. A shortcoming of disk when compared to tape is clearly one of power consumption and with some disk systems the amount of data center floor space they consume. While you can throw plenty of darts at tape, one thing that can be denied is its power or density. In our next entry we will cover what needs to be improved when it comes to data center efficiency.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Four Faces of Fraud: Identity, 'Fake' Identity, Ransomware & Digital
David Shefter, Chief Technology Officer at Ziften Technologies,  6/14/2018
Meet 'Bro': The Best-Kept Secret of Network Security
Greg Bell, CEO, Corelight,  6/14/2018
Containerized Apps: An 8-Point Security Checklist
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/14/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-9036
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
CheckSec Canopy 3.x before 3.0.7 has stored XSS via the Login Page Disclaimer, allowing attacks by low-privileged users against higher-privileged users.
CVE-2018-12327
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
Stack-based buffer overflow in ntpq and ntpdc of NTP version 4.2.8p11 allows an attacker to achieve code execution or escalate to higher privileges via a long string as the argument for an IPv4 or IPv6 command-line parameter. NOTE: It is unclear whether there are any common situations in which ntpq ...
CVE-2018-12558
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
The parse() method in the Email::Address module through 1.909 for Perl is vulnerable to Algorithmic complexity on specially prepared input, leading to Denial of Service. Prepared special input that caused this problem contained 30 form-field characters ("\f").
CVE-2018-6563
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in totemomail Encryption Gateway before 6.0.0_Build_371 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) change user settings, (2) send emails, or (3) change contact information by leveraging lack of an anti...
CVE-2018-1120
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-20
A flaw was found affecting the Linux kernel before version 4.17. By mmap()ing a FUSE-backed file onto a process's memory containing command line arguments (or environment strings), an attacker can cause utilities from psutils or procps (such as ps, w) or any other program which makes a read() call t...