News
11/29/2010
03:58 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Are You Ready For High Speed Storage Interfaces?

A new wave of high speed storage interfaces is on the way offering improved storage I/O performance To see the expected performance improvement you have to do more than simply add drives with the new interface and install a host bus adapter in the server, you have to make sure every link in the I//O chain is ready.

A new wave of high speed storage interfaces is on the way offering improved storage I/O performance To see the expected performance improvement you have to do more than simply add drives with the new interface and install a host bus adapter in the server, you have to make sure every link in the I//O chain is ready.The high speed interfaces include 6 Gb/s SATA, SAS as well as 8Gb/s and 16Gb/s fibre. All of these are significant step levels up in storage I/O capabilities of the connection to your storage. The storage devices are ready for it thanks to technologies like wide striping and solid state disk. Fibre on the drive may be waining and 6Gb/s SAS/SATA seem like they will be the primary drive interface for the future. There may be a few demands for fibre in legacy enterprise storage systems until they can move over to SAS.

The dual ports, greater queue depth and lower latency of 6Gb/s SAS as well as its very interesting light networking capabilities can make it the ideal interface for larger enterprise storage and shared storage systems. As we discuss in our article "Solid-State Drive Connectivity Options" 6Gb/s SATA, while not dual ported and more latent, is less expensive and is also compatible with all the 3GB/s SATA ports that are readily available on existing servers although running at the slower speed, making the move to an SSD drive potentially easier if it has a SATA interface instead of a SAS interface

To get full benefit from 6GB/s or greater speeds you have to make sure other links in the performance chain are able to support the faster speeds. The first place to start is the server. Upgrading it involves more than just inserting a 6Gb/s controller card into a PCIe slot and connecting it to a 6GB/s drive. Many users do this and are disappointed to find no performance increase. A common culprit is the backplane of the server; it has to be able to support the faster transfer rate and many of them can't. If your server does not have the backplane to support this level a performance, it doesn't mean that you can't benefit from the faster drive technologies, just know that you are not going to reach rated speeds.

If you know the backplane is able to support 6GB/s or you are OK living with less than maximum performance, the next area to look is the application on the server. In fact before adding any hardware to the environment, you always want to check CPU utilization. If CPU utilization is relatively high, say more than 60%, then you more than likely don't have a storage performance problem, you have a processing problem. If the CPU utilization is relatively low but performance of an application is not what it needs to be then there is a good chance you have a storage performance problem.

We document how to diagnose exactly what the performance problem is in our Visual SSD Readiness Guide but the CPU is a good early indicator. 6GB/s storage devices will improve response time and in most cases decrease latency, both of which should help accelerate an application. From there you want to look at either increasing the number of disk drives in the RAID group or moving to solid state disk.

Performance troubleshooting is a circular chain, once you speed up one link you expose other links' weaknesses. You have to keep fixing each link until you get to the point where your performance problem is resolved.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
10 Recommendations for Outsourcing Security
Enterprises today have a wide range of third-party options to help improve their defenses, including MSSPs, auditing and penetration testing, and DDoS protection. But are there situations in which a service provider might actually increase risk?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6477
Published: 2014-11-23
Unspecified vulnerability in the JPublisher component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, 12.1.0.1, and 12.1.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4290, CVE-2014-4291, CVE-2014-4292, CVE-2014-4...

CVE-2014-4807
Published: 2014-11-22
Sterling Order Management in IBM Sterling Selling and Fulfillment Suite 9.3.0 before FP8 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a '\0' character.

CVE-2014-6183
Published: 2014-11-22
IBM Security Network Protection 5.1 before 5.1.0.0 FP13, 5.1.1 before 5.1.1.0 FP8, 5.1.2 before 5.1.2.0 FP9, 5.1.2.1 before FP5, 5.2 before 5.2.0.0 FP5, and 5.3 before 5.3.0.0 FP1 on XGS devices allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-8626
Published: 2014-11-22
Stack-based buffer overflow in the date_from_ISO8601 function in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc/xmlrpc.c in PHP before 5.2.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by including a timezone field in a date, leading to improper XML-RPC encoding...

CVE-2014-8710
Published: 2014-11-22
The decompress_sigcomp_message function in epan/sigcomp-udvm.c in the SigComp UDVM dissector in Wireshark 1.10.x before 1.10.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted packet.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?