Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

To Improve Security, Get Your DAM Info Into SIEM

Database activity monitoring data can help big-picture security information management, experts say

Dec 03, 2010 | 12:34 PM | 

By Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer

Database activity monitoring (DAM) and security information and event management (SIEM) technologies historically have worked separately. But as security technology improves and threats change, the walls between the two technologies are beginning to come down, experts say.

To gain a comprehensive view of the activity in the database and its surrounding environs, organizations need to feed their DAM information into a SIEM tool, analysts and other observers advise.

"If all a customer is doing is trying to monitor a database, then clearly there isn't a lot of leverage in using SIEM for that use case," says Mike Rothman, analyst with Securosis. "But most customers are looking more broadly than just a database."

As Rothman sees it, the biggest advantage to integrating DAM with SIEM is the context it provides.

"A database attack is usually one aspect of a broader attack. The DAM has no visibility on network traffic, server configurations, exfiltration attempts, user activity, or a million other things," Rothman says. "The SIEM can find patterns in this broad set of data if it's configured to do so, so database information is one source of data."

According to Rick Caccia, vice president of marketing at SIEM vendor ArcSight, this additional context is particularly important for monitoring database access through applications that are tied into data stores -- but only through some layer of technological complexity.

"The common problem DAM products have is most customers don't have their applications directly talking to a database; they have some sort of application server that runs applications that talk to the database, and that application server tends to hold one connection to the database," Caccia explains. "It funnels all of the application user requests through that. So what it means is the application may see 'Rick' logged in and asking for a list of customers, but as far as the database knows, the user is just this thing called 'application server.'"

Tying DAM information into the SIEM allows an organization to more easily correlate the activity a user might have done on a front-end application with the query activity by an application server sent directly into the database.

"Organizations take application logs, send the application logs to the SIEM, send the DAM logs to the SIEM, and the SIEM correlates those two together," Caccia says. "It can see that at this particular moment in time, the application logged 'Fred' doing this -- and a split-second later, the DAM logged some user executing this query for the same type of information. So the SIEM will correlate those two together and say that most likely Fred did this."

Rothman and Caccia agree that one of the biggest challenges in feeding DAM into SIEM isn't the technology -- DAM and SIEM vendors have worked together during the past few years -- but is often caused by internal staff battles.

"Keep in mind there are organizational issues in making DAM and SIEM work together," Rothman explains. "DAM frequently resides within the database group. SIEM is within the security group. So getting the two groups to work together can be harder than integrating the data. Scary, but true."

As Caccia explains, one of the key problems is the age-old struggle between performance and security. He says that in order to make the integration go smoothly, organizations must hash out a compromise first.

"Where these [integration efforts] tend to fall apart are when the owners of the different pieces have different motivations," Caccia says. "The database administrators own the database, and their task is to make sure that database runs quickly and never fails.

"So when you have a process where you have an external security or audit organization saying, 'We need you to install this thing into the database memory and provide us with the logs that come out of it,' that's going to impact performance of the database, and it's going to impact stability," Caccia continues. "And you tend to get into these process battles of, 'Is this going to be installed in this database or not? And when can I do it?'"

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Database Security Reports

report Securing The Data Warehouse
Many enterprises are building data warehouses to centralize the ever-increasing information flowing through their organizations into useful repositories. This makes good business sense, but it opens up a slew of concerns from a security standpoint. IT professionals can apply many of the same security best practices used with databases, but there are new lessons to be learned as well.

report Defend Your Data From Malicious Insiders
The biggest threat to your company?s most sensitive data may be the employee who has legitimate access to corporate databases but less-than-legitimate intentions. And while the incidence of insider data breaches has decreased, external attacks often imitate them--and do serious damage. Follow our advice to mitigate the risk.

report Ensuring Secure Database Access
Role-based access control based on least user privilege is one of the most effective ways to prevent the compromise of corporate data. But proper provisioning is a growing challenging, due to the proliferation of "big data," NoSQLdatabases, and cloud-based data storage.

Other reports from the Database Security Tech Center:

Related Content

Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
As databases continue to grow in size, complexity and importance, enterprises struggle to identify the most appropriate controls regarding their use and misuse. The report identifies best practices, including: Implementing database activity monitoring to mitigate the high levels of risk from database vulnerabilities, and address audit findings in areas such as database segregation of duties and change management; using data security measures, such as data masking and data encryption; and monitoring privileged-user access and access to critical data.

Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving Into Database Audit and Protection
In this report, Gartner writes that "Database audit and protection (DAP) represents an evolutionary advance in database activity monitoring tools." DAP suites provide comprehensive, cross-platform support in heterogeneous database environments to protect sensitive data from inappropriate use. Organizations are increasingly concerned with optimizing database security and mitigating risks associated with database vulnerabilities.

Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
Data security presents a multi-dimensional challenge in today's complex IT environment. Multiple access paths and permission levels have resulted in a broad array of security threats and vulnerabilities. We invite you to read this new eBook: "Protecting against database attacks and insider threats" to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.

Demo: Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring and Audit Protection
Organizations across the globe continue to experience compromised data caused by malicious attacks, web application vulnerabilities or unauthorized changes. View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium? database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with a holistic approach to data security and compliance.

Look Beyond Native Database Auditing To Improve Security, Audit Visibility, And Real-Time Protection
Today's attacks on enterprise databases are more sophisticated than ever, and they occur so fast that it's often difficult to stop them in real time. Despite significant efforts to protect enterprise databases, the number of records breached has grown each year - due to all types of internal and external attacks and violations of corporate policy.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports