Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

New 'Anti-Social' Social Network Lets CSOs Share

Emerging online community for security executives to help one another better defend against attacks -- no vendors or consultants allowed

Nov 21, 2011 | 02:45 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
In the aftermath of the March attack on RSA, some SecurID customers turned to one another for help in deciding what to do about their organizations' potentially compromised tokens. Take The Bank of New York, which ultimately accelerated its plans to replace its tokens after its then-chief security officer (CSO) consulted with his counterparts at other companies.

"We were thinking about postponing it until 2012," says Tom Malta, a senior technology risk executive and former CSO at The Bank of New York. But after Malta posted a question to other members of an invitation-only social media network for CSOs and other security executives about how they were handling their RSA tokens in the wake of the breach, he learned most were already in the process of replacing their tokens. "I went back to my management [at The Bank of New York] and told them my peers in the industry were about to move on it, so we should do it [as well]," he says.

The RSA breach provided a classic test case for the so-called Wisegate online community, a new invitation-only social network where CSOs can confidentially share information about breaches, security events, and products. Wisegate was created last year and emerged from stealth mode in September as what its founder, Sara Gates, describes as "a private Yelp plus Match.com" aimed specifically at IT, especially information security executives such as CSOs. Gates, the former head of Sun Microsystems' identity management unit, says she conceived of the idea for an invitation-only social medium because top-level security execs need somewhere to congregate and safely and confidentially share and confer on security experiences, information, and intelligence.

"It's a resource fueled by community," Gates says. "Our mission is not to be a social network, but to be a resource that applies to delivering information from peers."

Malta, who is a founding member of the so-called Wisegate online community, says the RSA hack was a key example of how the Wisegate online community helps CSOs touch base with one another on how their organizations are handling a specific security event or new product rollout. "It helps bring a sense of urgency to our programs and enables us to go back to our companies on whether we should move on this or that," he says.

The underlying problem, of course, is that the bad guys are regularly sharing attack and other security intelligence, while victim organizations are at a disadvantage, typically isolated and without a main go-to place to share or compare their experiences.

There are plenty of other forums for sharing attack intelligence and other security issues, such as the Bay Area CSO Council, whose members arguably were one of the worst hit by Aurora, and had already been confidentially sharing various types of attack information long before that attack. The U.S. defense industry has its own online exchange for swapping attack information, for example, and the FBI-led InfraGuard events also serve as a way for local businesses, academic institutions, state and local law enforcement agencies, and CISOs to network and gain intelligence on the latest threats.

What's unique about Wisegate is that it's invitation-only, and no vendors are allowed. Phil Agcaoili, chief information security officer at Cox Communications, says the Wisegate security community is a new way for organizations to help one another defend against attackers. "Our adversaries are sharing and have been for quite some time," says Agcaoili, who is also a founding member of Wisegate. "Information-sharing on the defensive side is important … We need it across organizations, and we need people at all levels talking and sharing."

Agcaoili wouldn't give specifics on the kinds of things he discusses on the site with other CSOs and security professionals in keeping with the community's confidentiality policy, but he says the RSA compromise was a big topic this year. "We talked about the RSA compromise and came together" and shared information, he says. "Frankly, it put a little more urgency on the next steps for me and helped me solidify that there has to be more activity here, so let's not wait and make sure we are being more proactive" about responding to the RSA breach, he says.

The site's interface looks like a cross between LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and other social media sites, but it doesn't really operate like them. "It's sort of an unsocial social network. This is a private, by invitation-only community just for senior execs like myself for sharing what's going on in security and in and around technology," Malta says.

The catch, however, is that Wisegate is a subscription-based community, unlike most social media sites. Individual members pay $1,000 per year. Its members say it pays for itself, however, by precluding as much conference or live meeting travel. A member can invite a colleague or friend to join; that person is then vetted by Wisegate and, if accepted, offered membership. A member must have a senior title and work for a company with more than 1,000 employees. And he or she cannot work for a vendor.

And there's always that risk that not all members will respect the confidentiality rules of engagement. That has likely been why many members are still not sharing a lot of specifics on breaches in their organizations. "People are still hesitant in sharing the gory details," Malta says. "There have been a lot talking about breaches on a firewall or perimeter security and what people are doing with malware. They are starting to get a little more specific now."

There tends to be more collaboration on threats across the security disciplines within the community, which is broken into microcommunities. "For example, a member who runs identity management for a Fortune 1000 company was telling the cybersecurity-focused members that their receptionist had the latest malware on his laptop and that had become a point of vulnerability," Wisegate's Gates says. "As a result, they are focused as much on communicating with employees for what suspicious behavior might look like as they are with what technology can do. So the identity management-centric members and the APT-centric members are able to cross security disciplines to collaborate and solve problems."

Gates says individuals can request a membership invite by visiting this link.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Database Security Reports

report Securing The Data Warehouse
Many enterprises are building data warehouses to centralize the ever-increasing information flowing through their organizations into useful repositories. This makes good business sense, but it opens up a slew of concerns from a security standpoint. IT professionals can apply many of the same security best practices used with databases, but there are new lessons to be learned as well.

report Defend Your Data From Malicious Insiders
The biggest threat to your company?s most sensitive data may be the employee who has legitimate access to corporate databases but less-than-legitimate intentions. And while the incidence of insider data breaches has decreased, external attacks often imitate them--and do serious damage. Follow our advice to mitigate the risk.

report Ensuring Secure Database Access
Role-based access control based on least user privilege is one of the most effective ways to prevent the compromise of corporate data. But proper provisioning is a growing challenging, due to the proliferation of "big data," NoSQLdatabases, and cloud-based data storage.

Other reports from the Database Security Tech Center:

Related Content

Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
As databases continue to grow in size, complexity and importance, enterprises struggle to identify the most appropriate controls regarding their use and misuse. The report identifies best practices, including: Implementing database activity monitoring to mitigate the high levels of risk from database vulnerabilities, and address audit findings in areas such as database segregation of duties and change management; using data security measures, such as data masking and data encryption; and monitoring privileged-user access and access to critical data.

Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving Into Database Audit and Protection
In this report, Gartner writes that "Database audit and protection (DAP) represents an evolutionary advance in database activity monitoring tools." DAP suites provide comprehensive, cross-platform support in heterogeneous database environments to protect sensitive data from inappropriate use. Organizations are increasingly concerned with optimizing database security and mitigating risks associated with database vulnerabilities.

Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
Data security presents a multi-dimensional challenge in today's complex IT environment. Multiple access paths and permission levels have resulted in a broad array of security threats and vulnerabilities. We invite you to read this new eBook: "Protecting against database attacks and insider threats" to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.

Demo: Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring and Audit Protection
Organizations across the globe continue to experience compromised data caused by malicious attacks, web application vulnerabilities or unauthorized changes. View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium? database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with a holistic approach to data security and compliance.

Look Beyond Native Database Auditing To Improve Security, Audit Visibility, And Real-Time Protection
Today's attacks on enterprise databases are more sophisticated than ever, and they occur so fast that it's often difficult to stop them in real time. Despite significant efforts to protect enterprise databases, the number of records breached has grown each year - due to all types of internal and external attacks and violations of corporate policy.




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports