![]() |
Data security and privacy: A holistic approach Download here |
More than 90 percent of the more than 3,300 respondents across 36 countries said they experienced tangible losses as a result of a hack, with 84 percent reporting financial loss to the cost of a breach. Around one-fifth lost at least $195,000 in breaches during the past 12 months.
Meanwhile, Symantec attributes the unexpected bright spot of a decline in breaches to organizations employing better cybersecurity defenses: More than 70 percent of organizations saw attacks in the past 12 months, a decline of 5 percent from 2010. And those that experienced an increasing frequency of attacks dropped from 29 percent in 2010 to 21 percent this year. While 100 percent last year reported losses from cyberattacks, 92 percent did so in 2011.
The trend seems counterintuitive given the rash of high-profile breaches this year.
Downtime (43 percent), theft of employee identity data (30 percent), and intellectual property (19 percent) were the top three losses, according to Symantec's "2011 State of Security Survey," published this week. The most costly dollar-wise were lost productivity (35 percent) and lost revenue (23 percent), followed by (at 17 percent each) loss of organization, customer, or employee data; a damaged reputation; and compliance costs after the attack.
Ashish Mohindroo, senior director of product marketing for Symantec, says the large majority suffering real losses from cyberattacks is significant. "Twenty percent lost $195,000: That's a hefty price to pay for a breach," he says.
Even so, more businesspeople are focused on security more than ever before, he notes. "In the past, that was delegated to IT," he says. According to the findings, more than one-third of the respondents said security is somewhat/significantly more important within the business than it was 12 months ago.
Hackers are the No. 1 threat worry, with about half of the respondents citing them, followed by well-meaning employees (46 percent).
A copy of the full report is available here (PDF) for download.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Securing The Data Warehouse
Many enterprises are building data warehouses to centralize the ever-increasing information flowing through their organizations into useful repositories. This makes good business sense, but it opens up a slew of concerns from a security standpoint. IT professionals can apply many of the same security best practices used with databases, but there are new lessons to be learned as well.
Defend Your Data From Malicious Insiders
The biggest threat to your company?s most sensitive data may be the employee who has legitimate access to corporate databases but less-than-legitimate intentions. And while the incidence of insider data breaches has decreased, external attacks often imitate them--and do serious damage. Follow our advice to mitigate the risk.
Ensuring Secure Database Access
Role-based access control based on least user privilege is one of the most effective ways to prevent the compromise of corporate data. But proper provisioning is a growing challenging, due to the proliferation of "big data," NoSQLdatabases, and cloud-based data storage.
Other reports from the Database Security Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Establishing a Strategy for Database Security is No Longer Optional
As databases continue to grow in size, complexity and importance, enterprises struggle to identify the most appropriate controls regarding their use and misuse. The report identifies best practices, including: Implementing database activity monitoring to mitigate the high levels of risk from database vulnerabilities, and address audit findings in areas such as database segregation of duties and change management; using data security measures, such as data masking and data encryption; and monitoring privileged-user access and access to critical data.
Database Activity Monitoring Is Evolving Into Database Audit and Protection
In this report, Gartner writes that "Database audit and protection (DAP) represents an evolutionary advance in database activity monitoring tools." DAP suites provide comprehensive, cross-platform support in heterogeneous database environments to protect sensitive data from inappropriate use. Organizations are increasingly concerned with optimizing database security and mitigating risks associated with database vulnerabilities.
Protecting Against Database Attacks and Insider Threats: Top 5 Scenarios
Data security presents a multi-dimensional challenge in today's complex IT environment. Multiple access paths and permission levels have resulted in a broad array of security threats and vulnerabilities. We invite you to read this new eBook: "Protecting against database attacks and insider threats" to learn the top five scenarios and essential best practices for preventing database attacks and insider threats.
Demo: Distributed Database Security with Real-time Monitoring and Audit Protection
Organizations across the globe continue to experience compromised data caused by malicious attacks, web application vulnerabilities or unauthorized changes. View this demo and learn how IBM InfoSphere Guardium? database activity monitoring can help protect your sensitive data in distributed DBMS environments with a holistic approach to data security and compliance.
Look Beyond Native Database Auditing To Improve Security, Audit Visibility, And Real-Time Protection
Today's attacks on enterprise databases are more sophisticated than ever, and they occur so fast that it's often difficult to stop them in real time. Despite significant efforts to protect enterprise databases, the number of records breached has grown each year - due to all types of internal and external attacks and violations of corporate policy.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>