Every organization that shares protected information with partners needs to ensure that those entities will protect the data adequately while in their care. A data owner’s responsibility begins with assessing prospective partners’ security and compliance practices, and continues throughout the life of the relationship.
Organizations faced with this responsibility often ask the same questions:
1. How do you assess an partner’s security and compliance practices?
2. Should all service providers undergo similar assessments?
3. How can we control the cost of assessments?
Let’s take these one at a time.
1. How do you assess?
Organizations need to ensure that the vendor or partner will meet the requirements of the applicable contract or regulation. At a minimum, this means asking a set of questions about who has access; how information is stored, transmitted, and processed; and how information is encrypted (particularly while stored, while on removable devices, and while transmitted on public networks). The more prescriptive the particular regulation, the specific the questions need to be. The answers to the questions can be collected in person, in response to a questionnaire, or in third-party assessment. The method for assessment should be based on the risk a particular partner represents and your budget.
2. Should all partners be assessed equally?
No. Organizations should determine the inherent risk associated with a partner and base the depth and thoroughness of the assessment on this measure. For example, if the organization is entrusted with large amounts of critical data and a compromise would be extremely damaging to the business, then it makes sense to visit the vendor and conduct a detailed review. On the other hand, if the vendor has only controlled and restricted access to the information or would not pose a major risk if it failed, then a questionnaire might suffice.
3. How can assessment costs be controlled?
The first way to control costs is to ensure that detailed assessments are conducted only on critical vendors. Another method is to use the results of third-party assessments (assuming you can verify the trustworthiness of the assessor). The PCI Security Council established Qualified Security Assessors and the assessment process for this very reason. Other industries, including finance and healthcare, have organizations that provide assessment frameworks and methods that are commonly used. There are also international security standards, like ISO 27001 and 27002, and accounting standards (e.g., SAE 16) that provide frameworks for assessing operational, security, and compliance practices.
Regardless of the method used to assess or the organization assessing the partner, the important point to remember is that you must satisfy yourself that the partner will meet your compliance requirements. In the event of a compromise or an audit, you will need to state why you believe your method effectively met your compliance requirements.
Richard Mackey is vice president of consulting at SystemExperts Corp.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
How To Boost Security Via FFIEC Compliance
With just a smartphone, users can conduct nearly all their banking business at any time of the day or night. However, all this flexibility and convenience opens up new avenues for fraud and cybercrime. Guidelines laid out by the FFIEC several years ago predate many of the capabilities-and vulnerabilities-that are in place today. In this report, we examine the latest guidelines and provide advice on how you can extend the work done to comply with FFIEC guidelines to strengthen your organization's overall security posture and keep customers and their data safe.
Keeping Compliance In Check
Configuration mistakes, access control gaffes, poor documentation--it doesn?t take much for a compliance audit to go all wrong. In this special retrospective of recent news coverage, Dark Reading takes a look at the costs, common missteps and best practices for compliance, as well as the day the Internet nearly went dark due to the threat of new regulations.
FISMA Lifts All Compliance Boats
FISMA may not be on your radar now, but it likely will be at some point. Geared specifically toward the federal government and its affiliate agencies and third parties, FISMA is a very specific set of requirements aimed at establishing and maintaining at least a baseline level of computer and network security. FISMA requires unique categorization and classification of information assets, not to mention a boatload of documentation to prove compliance. But once your organization achieves FISMA compliance, it will likely be compliant with just about every security mandate out there.
Other reports from the Compliance Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Log Management in 2012 and Beyond
2012 brings interesting changes to the log management world. Now, more than ever, it is critical to understand the impact to your log infrastructure and the solutions that will better prepare you to manage your security posture.
SANS Log Management Survey Report
Organizations are increasingly dependent on log management to support core business functions, including cost management, service level and line-of-business application monitoring, as well as traditional IT- and security-focused activities.
Cut the Time and Effort of Troubleshooting and Reporting
Organizations generate millions of logs a day and struggle with centralized collection, storage and analysis of those logs. ArcSight Logger is a universal log management solution that unifies searching, reporting, alerting and analysis across any type of IT data. It consolidates silos of logs into a single indexed repository for fast detection and mitigation of operational issues.
Get Turnkey and Automated PCI Compliance
PCI compliance monitoring is seamless with the self-contained ArcSight PCI Logger solution for log collection, storage and analysis. No database administration expertise is required and a web-based interface simplifies deployment and ongoing management.
Swiss Bank Meets Compliance Requirements and Protects Customer Data
Due to long-term data retention requirements, Swiss bank EFG needed a cost-effective way to collect, secure and store audit-quality log data in an easily accessible log repository. ArcSight Logger helps EFG meet key requirements of Switzerland?s banking laws fast and cost-effectively.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>