Cloud
3/21/2016
09:40 AM
50%
50%

SWIFT To Issue Warning In Wake Of Cyberattack On Bagladesh Central Bank

SWIFT advises banks to follow recommended security practices for their internal networks after Bangladesh Central Bank heist.

After a recent cyber-theft of over $80 million from Bangladesh Bank, SWIFT today plans to advise banks to implement security measures to avoid similar attacks.

Brussels-based SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), which provides secure messaging services and software to financial institutions worldwide, will issue a security advisory today asking banks monitor their internal security. "Our priority at this time is to encourage customers to review and, where necessary, to reinforce their local operating environments," said a spokeswoman for the group told Reuters.

Security consultant Shane Shook said in the report that while SWIFT can recommend financial institutions to follow some security standards, there are no specific measures to be uniformly adopted by all of them to secure their networks against financial breaches.

As evident from an interim report on the Bangladesh attack submitted by forensics experts from FireEye and World Informatix, hackers breached the bank's network, accessed credentials for sending SWIFT messages, and processed transactions via malware installed on the bank's computers. According to Reuters, SWIFT confirmed that the attack was due to internal operational issues at Bangladesh Bank, and not due to SWIFT's core messaging system.

Investigators identified that these hackers have also targeted attacks on other financial institutions -- though they have not yet identified those banks.

Read more on the report from Reuters article.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
3/22/2016 | 12:24:57 PM
Offenders
This seems to have been a well executed attack. Have any of the offenders been apprehended? Or do we only have usernames at this point?
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
DNS Threats: What Every Enterprise Should Know
Domain Name System exploits could put your data at risk. Here's some advice on how to avoid them.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.