03:20 PM
Connect Directly

Cybersecurity Readiness Confidence Declined In 2016

New report querying security pros shows increase in worry about risks with mobile and cloud environments.

The confidence of security practitioners in global cybersecurity readiness fell slightly in 2016, according to a new report out today by CyberEdge Group and Tenable.

The 2017 Global Cybersecurity Assurance Report Card took a temperature-check from 700 security professionals about a number of key indicators to come up with a global index score to reflect their ability to assess cyber risks and their ability to mitigate threats. The study showed that the index fell six points in the last year to an overall "C-" score of 70%.

A big part of that drop came on the back of a 12-point decline in risk assessment capabilities. As a part of the assurance report, security practitioners were asked about their risk assessment capabilities in 11 key areas, including cloud environments, endpoints, and Web servers. Most areas achieved no better than mediocre scores, with the worst performances in emerging categories like containerization and DevOps environments, which received failing grades.

"Today’s network is constantly changing — mobile devices, cloud, IoT, Web apps, containers, virtual machines — and the data indicate that a lot of organizations lack the visibility they need to feel confident in their security posture," says Cris Thomas, strategist, Tenable Network Security. "It's pretty clear that newer technologies like DevOps and containers contributed to driving the overall score down, but the real story isn’t just one or two things that need improvement, it’s that everything needs improvement."

For example, despite years of lead time on the cloud front, many organizations are still struggling to assess cloud risks, according to the report. When it comes to the confidence in their organizations' abilities to assess risks in SaaS, IaaS, and PaaS environments, respondents gave an average D- score of 60%, down seven points compared to last year's confidence in cloud security. Similarly, confidence in mobile device risk assessment fell eight points, to a failing grade of 57%.

Respondents were also asked about the biggest challenges impacting their readiness. The two biggest challenges they cited: the overwhelming cyber threat environment and low security awareness of employees.

Even so, security practitioners were rosy about the ability of their organization to improve scores. When asked about whether they are optimistic or pessimistic about their organization's ability to protect against attacks this year compared to last year, nearly 65% say they were somewhat or significantly optimistic.

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Christian Bryant
Christian Bryant,
User Rank: Ninja
12/5/2016 | 4:41:52 PM
No Surprise - Next Steps?
I read these reports in full typically before I comment, but in terms of the drop I don't think anyone didn't see that coming with the massive shift to cloud computing for huge numbers of applications, the explosion of mobile computing companies and decentralization of IT resources (end user devices and servers). 

What was really telling was the change in my industry, Healthcare.  We have really got to get that one to the top of the grading system - anything less than an "A" is not acceptable when it comes to finances and healthcare privacy.

Now it's all about next steps, and here's to those being concrete, doable action items rather than more frilly process changes, pie-in-the-sky, big picture fantasies...
'Shift Left' & the Connected Car
Rohit Sethi, COO of Security Compass,  6/12/2018
Why CISOs Need a Security Reality Check
Joel Fulton, Chief Information Security Officer for Splunk,  6/13/2018
Microsoft Fixes 11 Critical, 39 Important Vulns
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
python before versions 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6 and 3.7.0 is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking in the difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK method. An attacker could use this flaw to cause denial of service.
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
The web console login form in ovirt-engine before version 4.2.3 returned different errors for non-existent users and invalid passwords, allowing an attacker to discover the names of valid user accounts.
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
An issue was discovered in Zuul 3.x before 3.1.0. If nodes become offline during the build, the no_log attribute of a task is ignored. If the unreachable error occurred in a task used with a loop variable (e.g., with_items), the contents of the loop items would be printed in the console. This could ...
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
An issue was discovered in the cantata-mounter D-Bus service in Cantata through 2.3.1. The mount target path check in mounter.cpp `mpOk()` is insufficient. A regular user can consequently mount a CIFS filesystem anywhere (e.g., outside of the /home directory tree) by passing directory traversal sequ...
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-19
An issue was discovered in the cantata-mounter D-Bus service in Cantata through 2.3.1. Arbitrary unmounts can be performed by regular users via directory traversal sequences such as a home/../sys/kernel substring.