Cloud

1/30/2012
11:04 PM
50%
50%

Cloud Means More Secure Remote Access

Connecting hosts running remote-access services directly to the Internet is so last decade. Instead, companies look to move to cloud-enabled services or virtual desktop infrastructure.

Remote-access software such as Symantec's pcAnywhere have been a popular option for companies and individuals that want to connect to their work computer from outside the office, or support organizations that want to allow remote maintenance.

Yet, the recent revelation that a hacking group gained access to the source code for pcAnywhere and subsequent warnings about vulnerabilities in the product has underscored that traditional remote access tools carry risks. A Symantec white paper listing a number of steps -- including not connecting the software directly to the Internet -- to reduce the attack surface of the product added emphasis to security concerns regarding remote-access software.

"Any software that is exposed to the Internet is at high risk, anyone can find out that you are running it," says Chris Wysopal, chief technology officer with Veracode, an application-security testing firm.

The concerns have highlighted some of the security benefits of using cloud infrastructure to boost the security of remote-access services. A cloud infrastructure can, for example, remove the Internet-visible signs that remote-access software is running behind a particular Internet address. Whereas scanning for the default ports used by remote-access software -- ports 5631 and 5632 in the case of pcAnywhere -- can give attackers a list of potentially vulnerable hosts.

"One of the fundamental benefits of cloud is the reduction of the attack surface -- there are no open ports," says Malte Muenke, vice president of engineering and operations for Citrix Online.

Citrix Online runs the popular GoToMyPC.com service, a remote-access service that uses frequently polling to the company's cloud servers as a means to pass data back to a host computer. There are no inbound connections to the host computer; instead, it pulls data down from the cloud. The result is that the attackable parts of the service -- any open ports -- are eliminated and the attack surface is reduced to a centrally managed hub that can be more easily secured and monitored.

"That is where a cloud service is more secure," he says. "You are concentrating all the attacks on one point, but you can secure that point really well."

Remote-access software such as pcAnywhere evolved from a time when each installation was managed separately. For companies that want to allow remote direct connectivity to a computer using pcAnywhere, Symantec issued a white paper with a long list of steps to reduce the attack surface area as much as possible.

Remote access to desktops and data via the cloud also has the benefits of central management. In addition, security policies can be more easily pushed to the endpoints, says Danny Allan, chief technology officer of Desktone, a virtual infrastructure company.

"The benefit of putting the desktop in the data center is that you can consistently apply policy," he says.

Yet, cloud is not a perfect solution. With so much trust be placed on a single cloud provider, companies need to make sure that they conduct the proper due diligence on the company, its infrastructure and security.

"I wouldn't say that any cloud offering is more secure," says Muenke. "So you really need to look at the vendor, see what they are claiming to do and ask if that is somebody that I can trust."

Moreover, the cloud does not solve the problem of insecurities caused by the end users. For example, the service relies on strong user credentials and, in many cases, that boils down to passwords.

"If you don't have strong password, a cloud service can clearly just as well can be at risk," Muenke says. "There is still responsibility on the user side."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
MS8699
50%
50%
MS8699,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/10/2012 | 12:08:15 PM
re: Cloud Means More Secure Remote Access
A number of steps including not connecting the software directly to the Internet to reduce the attack surface of the product added emphasis to security concerns regarding remote-access software.
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8354
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c has an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8355
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. In xmalloc.h, there is an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into the lsx_valloc macro that wraps malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in channels_start in remix.c.
CVE-2019-8356
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. One of the arguments to bitrv2 in fft4g.c is not guarded, such that it can lead to write access outside of the statically declared array, aka a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8357
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c allows a NULL pointer dereference.
CVE-2013-2516
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
Vulnerability in FileUtils v0.7, Ruby Gem Fileutils <= v0.7 Command Injection vulnerability in user supplied url variable that is passed to the shell.