Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Survey: Organizations Are Cloud-Conflicted

Symantec survey finds less than 20 percent of organizations worldwide have fully implemented cloud services

Oct 04, 2011 | 11:19 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
A new global survey of organizations worldwide found that businesses are conflicted when it comes to cloud security: Beefing up security is the main goal for those going to the cloud, but most don't think it will actually do so.

Say what?

David Elliott, senior product marketing manager for the global cloud marketing team at Symantec, which conducted the telephone survey of 5,800 organizations in 28 different countries, says the apparent discrepancy in the responses was "a little bit of a surprise."

Some 87 percent say moving to the cloud won't affect or improve their security posture even though it's their No. 1 goal for doing it, Elliott says. "I think they are just concerned and don't know where to start. We think it's even more interesting that they consider it a top goal. They are conflicted."

A big part of the problem is experience with cloud technology. About half say their IT staff is "less than somewhat prepared" for the move to the cloud, and fewer than one in four IT staffers has experience in it. Those who have deployed cloud services relied heavily on third-party help, too: Close to 80 percent say they leaned heavily on the expertise of systems integrators, consultants, VARs, or professional services organizations.

"Half are also growing their IT staff for the cloud," Elliott says.

But while up to 81 percent are discussing cloud adoption, only 11 to 19 percent have fully implemented it. Some 19 percent have software-as-a-service; 17 percent, private infrastructure or platform-as-a-service; 17 percent, public infrastructure-as-a-service or platform-as-a-service; and 11 percent, hybrid infrastructure- or platform-as-a-service.

There's also a disconnect between their expectations and reality: Eighty-eight percent expected their cloud services to enhance their security, but only about 50 percent say it actually did.

A full copy of Symantec's new "State of the Cloud Survey" is available here (PDF) for download.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Cloud Security Reports

report Monitoring And Measuring Cloud Providers' Security Performance
There is no ignoring the cloud, which means that IT professionals must find ways to monitor and measure the performance of cloud providers. While moving even in part to a cloud model is a big change for many reasons, the most significant difference is a loss of direct control. Just as security groups often struggle with managing security inside a corporation when in a governance role, we struggle even more with governing the security of assets that no longer sit within our own data centers. The challenge is to develop and implement a strong governance model for these cloud offerings that ensures that security is part of the conversation.

report How to Manage Identity in the Public Cloud
Use of the public cloud for enterprise applications complicates what was already a complicated task: identity management. As companies increase their use of cloud-based applications, IT and security professionals must make some tough and far-reaching decisions about how to provision, deprovision and otherwise manage user access. This Dark Reading report examines the options and provides recommendations for determining which one is right for your organization.

report Spot Trouble In The Cloud: Adapting Security Monitoring & Incident Response.
Security monitoring, incident response and forensics are essential, even in the cloud. But the cloud by definition implies relinquishing at least some control, which can make these practices problematic. In this report, we identify the challenges of detecting and responding to security issues in the cloud and discuss the most effective ways to address them.

Other reports from the Cloud Security Tech Center:




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports