Vulnerabilities / Threats // Advanced Threats
7/7/2014
06:30 PM
Tim Wilson
Tim Wilson
Quick Hits
50%
50%

Chinese Attackers Targeting U.S. Think Tanks, Researchers Say

Government-backed group "Deep Panda" compromised "several" nonprofit national security policy research organizations, CrowdStrike says

The Chinese cyber attack group Deep Panda late last month compromised "several" national security think tanks with multiple, simultaneous, and sophisticated attacks designed to collect information about foreign policy decisions, according to researchers at security firm CrowdStrike.

Deep Panda, a group that has been attacking targets in the high-tech, financial services, and government arenas since 2009, was found to be cracking think tank systems to collect data on national security policy related to southeast Asia and the Middle East -- two areas where international disputes heightened in June. CrowdStrike officials declined to name the think tanks or the exact details of the data that was compromised, but the attackers breached email, directories and files, they said.

Deep Panda had been collecting information primarily on U.S. policy in southeast Asia, but suddenly shifted direction and began collecting data about Iraq and Middle East policy, according to a blog posted on the CrowdStrike site this afternoon.

"This is undoubtedly related to the recent Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) takeover of major parts of Iraq, and the potential disruption for major Chinese oil interests in that country," the blog says. "In fact, Iraq happens to be the fifth-largest source of crude oil imports for China and the country is the largest foreign investor in Iraq’s oil sector. Thus, it wouldn’t be surprising if the Chinese government is highly interested in getting a better sense of the possibility of deeper U.S. military involvement that could help protect the Chinese oil infrastructure in Iraq. In fact, the shift in targeting of Iraq policy individuals occurred on June 18, the day that ISIS began its attack on the Baiji oil refinery."

The attacks were sophisticated, exploiting a vulnerability in Windows which allowed the group to deploy powershell scripts as scheduled tasks on Microsoft Windows machines, according to CrowdStrike. "The scripts are passed to the powershell interpreter through the command line to avoid placement of extraneous files on the victim machine that could potentially trigger AV- or Indicator of Compromise (IOC)-based detection," the blog states.

"This particular group makes a lot of attacks through a Web exploit or SQL injection, which is followed by in-memory and command line exploits that are difficult to detect because they don't leave artifacts behind," says Adam Meyers, vice president of intelligence at CrowdStrike. "This is a tactic that they will probably continue to use because it works well for them."

CrowdStrike was able to detect the attacks through its Falcon Host software, an agent that collects security information from each endpoint and correlates it with threat data that the company collects from other endpoints. CrowdStrike provides its software to a number of think tanks and human rights organizations on a pro bono basis, because they are nonprofit organizations but are frequent targets of cyber espionage, Meyers says.

The think tanks are "well into the cleanup" of the compromises and are taking steps to prevent future similar attacks, Meyers states. However, it is likely that Deep Panda will continue to target such organizations, he says.

"These think tanks often employ ex-government people who have great contacts and are well connected with foreign governments," Meyers notes. "They are a great source of policy data and I don't think Deep Panda will stop targeting them anytime soon."

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-5395
Published: 2014-11-21
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Huawei HiLink E3276 and E3236 TCPU before V200R002B470D13SP00C00 and WebUI before V100R007B100D03SP01C03, E5180s-22 before 21.270.21.00.00, and E586Bs-2 before 21.322.10.00.889 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users ...

CVE-2014-7137
Published: 2014-11-21
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Dolibarr ERP/CRM before 3.6.1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) contactid parameter in an addcontact action, (2) ligne parameter in a swapstatut action, or (3) project_ref parameter to projet/tasks/contact.php; (4...

CVE-2014-7871
Published: 2014-11-21
SQL injection vulnerability in Open-Xchange (OX) AppSuite before 7.4.2-rev36 and 7.6.x before 7.6.0-rev23 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted jslob API call.

CVE-2014-8090
Published: 2014-11-21
The REXML parser in Ruby 1.9.x before 1.9.3 patchlevel 551, 2.0.x before 2.0.0 patchlevel 598, and 2.1.x before 2.1.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) a crafted XML document containing an empty string in an entity that is used in a large number of nes...

CVE-2014-8469
Published: 2014-11-21
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Guests/Boots in AdminCP in Moxi9 PHPFox before 4 Beta allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the User-Agent header.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?