Operations //

Identity & Access Management

3/3/2015
04:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Breach Victims Three Times Likelier To Be Identity Theft Victims

Twenty-eight percent of them say they later avoided the merchants that failed to protect their personal information.

Both the number of identity theft victims and the amount of money stolen by identity thieves decreased slightly in 2014, but that doesn't mean merchants can relax their protections on customer payment card data, according to a report released today by Javelin Strategy & Research.

According to the study, individuals whose card data was exposed in a data breach were three times more likely to become victims of identity fraud. Plus, 28 percent of those victims said that, after the breach, they avoided the merchants that had failed to protect their personal information.

The Javelin study, in its 12th year, calculates that 12.7 million individuals were victims of identity theft in 2014 (a 3 percent decrease from the previous year), two-thirds of whom had received data breach notifications. In total, $16 billion was stolen from them -- $1,260 per person, on average -- which is an 11 percent decrease.

It may have decreased, but it hasn't gone away. Identity theft complaints topped the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) list for the 15th year in a row, according to the Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book, released by the FTC Friday. Thirteen percent of the 2.6 million complaints received by the FTC -- either directly, or via law enforcement agencies, national consumer protection organizations and non-governmental organizations -- were related to identity theft.

Another top complaint (which moved up to number three on the FTC's list) was "imposter scams" -- cons and attacks in which the perpetrators claimed to represent the Internal Revenue Service and other government agencies.

One dubious positive from the Javelin study is that account fraud -- meaning, a new credit account is opened with the victim's name -- hit an all time low. Simple, straightforward theft was more common. Account fraud continues to be one of the costliest types of attack, and also takes the longest to detect. According to Javelin, account fraud is three times more likely to take a year or more to discover than other types of identity theft.

Florida, Washington, and Oregon reported the most identity theft complaints, according to the FTC. The Javelin study found that the population hit hardest by it in 2014 was students -- who were also the least concerned about identity theft and least likely to discover it on their own.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Technocrati
50%
50%
Technocrati,
User Rank: Ninja
3/5/2015 | 6:47:50 PM
Expanding the Definition of Identity Theft.
" The Javelin study, in its 12th year, calculates that 12.7 million individuals were victims of identity theft in 2014 ...."


This is really interesting figure that I would have thought would have been higher.

I can't wait to see the numbers for 2015. Who is taking the over/under at 25 mil in 2015 ?    If the definition of "identity theft"  is expanded to include the breech itself  this figure will easily be obliterated by 2015 numbers.
Devastating Cyberattack on Email Provider Destroys 18 Years of Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/12/2019
Up to 100,000 Reported Affected in Landmark White Data Breach
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8354
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c has an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8355
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. In xmalloc.h, there is an integer overflow on the result of multiplication fed into the lsx_valloc macro that wraps malloc. When the buffer is allocated, it is smaller than expected, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow in channels_start in remix.c.
CVE-2019-8356
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. One of the arguments to bitrv2 in fft4g.c is not guarded, such that it can lead to write access outside of the statically declared array, aka a stack-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-8357
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
An issue was discovered in SoX 14.4.2. lsx_make_lpf in effect_i_dsp.c allows a NULL pointer dereference.
CVE-2013-2516
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-15
Vulnerability in FileUtils v0.7, Ruby Gem Fileutils <= v0.7 Command Injection vulnerability in user supplied url variable that is passed to the shell.