Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits
Dark Reading's dark-dominion Weblog

Topics:   Dark Dominion : Security Services Tech Center
  • |   Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

For SMBs, Being Security-Savvy Doesn't Always Mean Doing It Yourself

When it comes to security, most security professionals -- indeed, most Dark Reading readers -- are do-it-yourselfers. They do their own research, find their own bugs, and remediate their own systems. It's almost a rite of passage -- if you have to ask for help, you can't be a real security pro. But I wonder, sometimes, if this attitude doesn't hurt small and midsize businesses, in which having even one full-time security professional is more than many can afford. Such businesses are just as concerned about security as their larger counterparts, but when their people attempt to ask questions or get the tools they need to build strong defenses, they are treated as "neophytes" or given tools they simply do not have the time or skills to learn to use properly. And because they don't have tools that work at their skill levels or have the support of the elite security community, they are sometimes left with no easy way to access the best defenses and tools available.

Jun 04, 2009 | 02:28 PM | 

By Tim Wilson
Dark Reading
When it comes to security, most security professionals -- indeed, most Dark Reading readers -- are do-it-yourselfers. They do their own research, find their own bugs, and remediate their own systems. It's almost a rite of passage -- if you have to ask for help, you can't be a real security pro.

But I wonder, sometimes, if this attitude doesn't hurt small and midsize businesses, in which having even one full-time security professional is more than many can afford. Such businesses are just as concerned about security as their larger counterparts, but when their people attempt to ask questions or get the tools they need to build strong defenses, they are treated as "neophytes" or given tools they simply do not have the time or skills to learn to use properly. And because they don't have tools that work at their skill levels or have the support of the elite security community, they are sometimes left with no easy way to access the best defenses and tools available.Without a viable in-house option, many SMBs begin to seek out third-party security services that can help them do business securely. They begin to pay attention to late-night TV ads for Finallyfast.com or Internet ads that promise "spyware removal services" at impossibly low prices. And the next thing they know, small business IT administrators have made their environments even less secure than they were before.

And the situation is getting worse. As the economy shrinks, SMBs have even less time and resources to devote to security. But in difficult economic times, cybercriminals step up their efforts to hack and fool small businesses, and the number of fraudulent "security services" and solutions continues to increase. Despite advances in security technology, one could easily argue that SMBs have never been so vulnerable to attack than as they are right now.

What's needed is some guidance on how to choose third-party security services, especially when you have little or no security expertise in-house. SMB employees with IT responsibilities need to understand the vast differences between services from companies such as Microsoft or AT&T, and the technologies that are offered by startups and independent service providers that may -- or may not -- offer viable options. Next week, Dark Reading will publish a short guide about how to choose a service provider -- a report that will at least provide a few tips on the selection process.

But more help is needed. In the long run, SMBs need some means of vetting potential security service providers, either through standards organizations or a sanity-checking organization that plays a role similar to Consumer Reports. It isn't fair that the companies least able to evaluate security services -- those with the fewest security skills -- are the ones most likely to rely on third-party service providers for the very integrity of their data. It's simply too easy today for a small business to be sold down the river by a security service provider that promises the moon.

Until some method of certifying security services exists, however, I call on the most talented and savvy security professionals -- the readers of Dark Reading -- to play a more active role in helping small businesses to learn what they need to know about security. This assistance could take the form of guidance offered via online forums or Websites, where real expertise is hard to find. Or perhaps some of these savvy security pros ought to test out these third-party services -- the Finallyfast.coms of the world -- and find out whether they really do what they say they do. It seems to me that such an honest evaluation would be at least as valuable to the public as finding another fleeting flaw in Microsoft Office, if not more so.

What do you say, security researchers? How about checking for vulnerabilities in security services, as well as application code? For the folks who can't afford to do it themselves, a little help from the best in the class might be just what the doctor ordered.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS









  1. Cookies, Social Media And FireSheep
  2. SMB Guide To Credit Card Regulations, Part 2: The Low-Hanging Fruit
  3. HP And The Scary Corporate Fifth Column Concept
  4. Taking USB Attacks To The Next Level
  5. NoSQL: Not Much, Anyway
  1. Taking Cybersecurity Lessons To The Bank
  2. Researchers See Real-Time Phishing Jump
  3. 'BlackSheep' Sniffs Out Firesheep WiFi-Hacking
  4. Slideshow: Ten Free Security Monitoring Tools
  5. A Different Spin On Sleuthing Stuxnet
  6. M&A Activity Muddles Database Security
  1. Secure Managed Web Hosting Saves 960.gs from Malicious Hackers
  2. Access Governance as a Business Service: An Integrated Strategy for Automation with ITSM
  3. Business Driven Access Management and Governance: Simplifying the Delivery and Governance of Access Throughout
 
 


 
  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag
 
  February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008