Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits
Dark Reading's evil-bytes Weblog

Topics:   Evil Bytes
  • |   Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Oracle Patches Get Bad Rap

On the surface, a recently published survey by the Independent Oracle Users Group (IOUG) bears some seemingly frightening numbers. According to the study, which was conducted during the middle of 2008, 26 percent of 150 respondents admitted that their respective companies require the quarterly Oracle patches to be applied upon release. Nineteen percent said their companies don't have any policies at all regarding patches. Only 42 percent believed the patches from Oracle were effective in helping them keep a positive security posture.

Feb 27, 2009 | 03:34 PM | 

By John H. Sawyer
Dark Reading
On the surface, a recently published survey by the Independent Oracle Users Group (IOUG) bears some seemingly frightening numbers. According to the study, which was conducted during the middle of 2008, 26 percent of 150 respondents admitted that their respective companies require the quarterly Oracle patches to be applied upon release. Nineteen percent said their companies don't have any policies at all regarding patches. Only 42 percent believed the patches from Oracle were effective in helping them keep a positive security posture.Why do Oracle customers disregard the seriousness of the vendor patches? Do they not have strong CSOs who understand the risks associated with not patching? Or is it that they feel protected already? If nearly half think the Oracle updates are positive toward their security postures, what is the other half doing that makes them feel secure already?

As a security professional, I find it hard to believe the questionnaire's respondents are responsible for truly mission-critical systems that, if hacked, could cause the organization's demise. On the other hand, I know that Oracle systems don't simply sit exposed on the Internet, though, sadly, exceptions probably exist. They'll be contained inside the corporate perimeter within the datacenter, and quite possibly within an even more tightly controlled network segment within the datacenter.

So, what's the significance of these numbers? Not much. That's because the survey doesn't provide any context as to why the companies are not patching. The IOUG's president said it's likely that admins don't patch their systems because they're more isolated, as I said above, but I'm still left wondering what the numbers really mean without having more questions answered, such as: Did the companies perform comprehensive risk assessments to determine whether to deploy Oracle patches?

What I do want to point out for you infosec pros and pen testers is a great resource on hacking Oracle servers. During the past few months, Chris Gates has put on his blog, Carnal0wnage, some awesome examples of using the Metasploit Framework's Oracle modules. If you have Oracle servers in your environment or perform pen testing for companies that use Oracle, take the time to walk through the examples and test out the modules. You never know when they might come in handy.

John H. Sawyer is a senior security engineer on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. The views and opinions expressed in this blog are his own and do not represent the views and opinions of the UF IT Security Team or the University of Florida. When John's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS









  1. Cookies, Social Media And FireSheep
  2. SMB Guide To Credit Card Regulations, Part 2: The Low-Hanging Fruit
  3. HP And The Scary Corporate Fifth Column Concept
  4. Taking USB Attacks To The Next Level
  5. NoSQL: Not Much, Anyway
  1. Taking Cybersecurity Lessons To The Bank
  2. Researchers See Real-Time Phishing Jump
  3. 'BlackSheep' Sniffs Out Firesheep WiFi-Hacking
  4. Slideshow: Ten Free Security Monitoring Tools
  5. A Different Spin On Sleuthing Stuxnet
  6. M&A Activity Muddles Database Security
  1. Secure Managed Web Hosting Saves 960.gs from Malicious Hackers
  2. Access Governance as a Business Service: An Integrated Strategy for Automation with ITSM
  3. Business Driven Access Management and Governance: Simplifying the Delivery and Governance of Access Throughout
 
 


 
  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag
 
  February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008