Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits
Dark Reading's security-views Weblog

Topics:   Database Security Tech Center : Security Views
  • |   Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Seven Features To Look For In Database Assessment Tools

As a follow-up to my "Essentials of Database Assessment" post, I want to go over some of the basic features and functions to look for in a database assessment product. Many features differentiate one tool from another, but I'll focus in on the top seven items you should review.

Sep 07, 2010 | 09:59 AM | 

By Adrian Lane
Dark Reading
As a follow-up to my "Essentials of Database Assessment" post, I want to go over some of the basic features and functions to look for in a database assessment product. Many features differentiate one tool from another, but I'll focus in on the top seven items you should review.Here are the top seven features to evaluate in database assessment tools:

1. Expert Research & Current Policies: The principal cost in developing a database vulnerability assessment tool is the cost of building and maintaining a policy library. Thousands of man-hours go into policy research and creation, and how current the policies are have a major impact on the security of the database. Zero-day threats are just that, and the assessment vendors lead the database vendors in detection by days or weeks in advance. The vendor should release policy updates at least on a quarterly basis, and have a track record of releasing policy updates within days of critical vulnerability discoveries. All vendors offer compliance specific policies, but not all of them are good, so you'll need to review.

2. Integration & Alerts: A vulnerability is detected and it needs attention. For small organization, email alerts are enough. Large organizations live and die with their trouble ticketing systems to track problems and remediation. Every assessment product integrates with external services for workflow, help desk, and reporting.

3. Baselining: It's easier to review configuration when you know specifically what changed from week to week. Matching current scan results with the previous settings, or even comparisons with ideal settings from a security or compliance standpoint, illuminate what needs to be fixed. Being able to set baselines and capture previous scan settings is important to saving review time and being able to react quickly.

4. Credentialed Access: At a minimum, you want to be able to connect to the database and scan the database internal structures. This is called a credentialed scan: It collects more information, and the results are more accurate than penetration test-based network scans, or scans performed at the OS layer.

5. Agent and agentless deployment. Maintaining agents is a hassle. However, there are some advantages to agents in that they can provide both an OS layer scan of configuration settings, as well as scanning the database internals. Second, agents work better in virtual server environments that are difficult to discover and scan given the obscure nature of network addresses in virtual environments. Choose a tool that offers both deployment options.

6. Scheduling: Most firms I speak with run scans once a week, though one a month is fine for mid-size and smaller firms. Automated scheduling, either built-in or available through external interfaces, is needed to make sure the scans run on time and are staggered so that not all of the scans run at the same time.

7. Database support: Obviously, the vendor needs to cover the platforms you need. You may not find a tool for Postgres or Teradata, but Oracle, SQL Server, DB2, MySQL, and Sybase are standard.

Keep in mind that even if you have zero budget, you can still perform authorization, configuration, and patch checking. If your environment is just a handful of databases and does not involve complex database deployments, then the burden is on you, but manual inspection or custom scripts will get the job done. That said, the breadth of security knowledge and depth of technical skill required for policy development is beyond what most DBA possess.

If you are assigned with security and compliance responsibilities across multiple products/systems, you will find that investment in an assessment tool saves you from developing, testing, and maintaining hundreds of complex queries to test for vulnerabilities. And it saves you from writing the glue code to integrate with other systems used by operations, security, or compliance groups interested in the scan results. Believe me, I know from experience that this savings in time and aggravation will justify the expense.

Application Security Inc., Fortinet, Imperva, Qualys, Sentrigo, and Tenable, and some of the database vendors provide these tools. (There is software, hardware, and SaaS offerings among this group). And some of the vendors provide free stuff too, and these tools will do the basics, but be warned: They're free for a reason.

Adrian Lane is an analyst/CTO with Securosis LLC, an independent security consulting practice. Special to Dark Reading.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS









  1. Cookies, Social Media And FireSheep
  2. SMB Guide To Credit Card Regulations, Part 2: The Low-Hanging Fruit
  3. HP And The Scary Corporate Fifth Column Concept
  4. Taking USB Attacks To The Next Level
  5. NoSQL: Not Much, Anyway
  1. Taking Cybersecurity Lessons To The Bank
  2. Researchers See Real-Time Phishing Jump
  3. 'BlackSheep' Sniffs Out Firesheep WiFi-Hacking
  4. Slideshow: Ten Free Security Monitoring Tools
  5. A Different Spin On Sleuthing Stuxnet
  6. M&A Activity Muddles Database Security
  1. Secure Managed Web Hosting Saves 960.gs from Malicious Hackers
  2. Access Governance as a Business Service: An Integrated Strategy for Automation with ITSM
  3. Business Driven Access Management and Governance: Simplifying the Delivery and Governance of Access Throughout
 
 


 
  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag
 
  February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008