Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits
Dark Reading's evil-bytes Weblog

Topics:   Evil Bytes
  • |   Email this page E-mail
  • |  Print Print
  • |   Bookmark and Share

Developers Often Left Out Of Security Training

A good friend was telling me recently about a risk assessment he was involved with in which his organization found some vulnerabilities in the Web application. When they asked the developer about them, the response was, "What is cross site scripting?" Wow -- how is it that in this day and age that someone, who probably considers themselves to be a competent Web developer, doesn't know XSS? Ask them about SQL injection, and the response would probably be the same.

Jun 17, 2009 | 03:10 PM | 

By John H. Sawyer
Dark Reading
A good friend was telling me recently about a risk assessment he was involved with in which his organization found some vulnerabilities in the Web application. When they asked the developer about them, the response was, "What is cross site scripting?" Wow -- how is it that in this day and age that someone, who probably considers themselves to be a competent Web developer, doesn't know XSS? Ask them about SQL injection, and the response would probably be the same.Now, working in a university environment day-to-day and having met a lot of students during the years, it's clear that there is little to no focus on secure programming in most academic environments. So my question is, where do we expect programmers to learn about secure programming? I know of some higher education institutions that do focus on secure programming, but there seems to be a much larger percentage that don't.

With graduating students entering the workforce with no knowledge of secure programming, it becomes the burden of their hiring employers to either teach them about secure programming through training, or to suffer the consequences of vulnerabilities that might be introduced from the programmers' lack of knowledge. The SANS Institute has some training on secure programming, but I think it gets overlooked -- as do the developers.

Let's do a little survey: How many of you have in-house developers? And how much money is spent training your in-house developers compared to your network engineers, general IT staff, and security team?

Based on the answers to the questions above, is your company promoting and developing solid, secure programming skills among its developers? I understand that teaching programming and security skills are different, so comparing the two may be difficult. But I think the issue is that when seeking out security training for IT, there is more emphasis on network and host security, and little to none on development.

Some of the focus on where the training budget goes will of course depend on what will best help protect the organization. If the developers are working on critical apps that touch sensitive data that is used both internally and on the Web, then obviously a large amount of money should be focused on making sure the programming is secure and the data, protected. Makes sense to me.

What's your experience with training and prioritizing who gets the money?

Drop me a line via e-mail or via the comment form below.

John H. Sawyer is a senior security engineer on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. The views and opinions expressed in this blog are his own and do not represent the views and opinions of the UF IT Security Team or the University of Florida. When John's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS









  1. Cookies, Social Media And FireSheep
  2. SMB Guide To Credit Card Regulations, Part 2: The Low-Hanging Fruit
  3. HP And The Scary Corporate Fifth Column Concept
  4. Taking USB Attacks To The Next Level
  5. NoSQL: Not Much, Anyway
  1. Taking Cybersecurity Lessons To The Bank
  2. Researchers See Real-Time Phishing Jump
  3. 'BlackSheep' Sniffs Out Firesheep WiFi-Hacking
  4. Slideshow: Ten Free Security Monitoring Tools
  5. A Different Spin On Sleuthing Stuxnet
  6. M&A Activity Muddles Database Security
  1. Secure Managed Web Hosting Saves 960.gs from Malicious Hackers
  2. Access Governance as a Business Service: An Integrated Strategy for Automation with ITSM
  3. Business Driven Access Management and Governance: Simplifying the Delivery and Governance of Access Throughout
 
 


 
  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag
 
  February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
  May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008