Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Study: How Data Breaches Damage Brand Reputation

Experian/Ponemon Institute study says breached firms' brands lose 12 percent of value

Oct 27, 2011 | 08:47 PM | 

By Kelly Jackson Higgins
Dark Reading
Ever wonder how data breaches actually ultimately affect an organization's reputation? A new survey found that it takes an average of one year for a victim organization to restore its rep after a hack.

The Experian Data Breach Resolution-sponsored study of 850 executives found that data breaches have long-term effects on a brand's value: Victim organizations lost anywhere from $184 million to more than $330 million in the value of their brands. At best, their brands' value lost 12 percent of their value, according to the study, conducted by the Ponemon Institute, or up to one-fourth of the brand's value in some cases. This was based on an average brand value of $1.5 billion -- prior to the breach.

"The loss or theft of sensitive customer data, as our study quantifies, can have a serious impact on the economic value of a company's reputation," said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute, in a statement. "We believe this study makes a powerful point about the importance of taking steps to reduce the likelihood of a data breach."

Of the 843 senior-level professionals who responded to the survey, 73 said their brand image and reputation are "inextricably linked," according to the report. Less than half said their companies' brand image and reputation could weather a data breach.

More than 40 percent said they had not had an incident response plan in place before they suffered a data breach.

"A solid reputation is a company's greatest asset, and it is therefore imperative that business leaders take precautionary steps to protect themselves, their customers, their employees and their intellectual property against data breaches," said Ozzie Fonseca, director at Experian Data Breach Resolution.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS



Authentication Reports

report What's Next for Certificate Technology
A recent rash of certificate authority breaches has left a bad taste in many people's mouths. There is no one reason for the breaches. The compromises were the result of a breakdown in people, processes and technology, but not necessarily the certificates themselves. We take a look at what?s wrong with certificate technology, what can be done to fix it, and what's down the road for certificates and CAs.

report Will Smartcards Live Up to Their Name?
Recent compromises of smartcard data have exacerbated concerns about the technology?s privacy, security and standards (or lack thereof). Yet the promise of smartcards is too compelling to ignore. New technologies and applications prompt us to take a fresh look.

report Get The Best Of Biometrics
As data volume and sensitivity grow, companies cannot rely on password- and token-based authentication. Biometrics can be used to provide strong access control, but you must weigh added complexity and costs against assurance that users are who they say they are.

Other reports from the Authentication Tech Center:




Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports