Attacks/Breaches
12/18/2009
02:12 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Twitter Hit By DNS Hijacking Attack

Twitter site redirected to 'Iranian Cyber Army' Website for about an hour last night

In what at first appeared to be a compromise of Twitters servers, users to the site were greeted with the message "This site has been hacked by Iranian Cyber Army" for about an hour late last night.

Twitter later reported that its DNS records, not its servers, had instead been temporarily compromised. "As some noticed, Twitter.com was redirected for a while but API and platform applications were working. We will update with more information and details once we've investigated more fully," read Twitter's blog post.

Security experts say it appears to have been a DNS hijacking attack and was mostly used for hacktivism. Twitter users were just redirected to the hacktivists' site, but it could have been much worse. "These sorts of attacks are usually limited to hacktivism activities like this one today, but imagine the potential to criminals if they could pull this off against any site requiring log in credentials, such as PayPal, eBay, MSN, Facebook," blogged Rik Ferguson, solutions architect for Trend Micro. "One has to wonder how quickly the attack would be noted if the dummy site was an exact replica of the victim and was simply there to harvest credentials and redirect the user then into the real site."

Beth Jones, security analyst at Sophos, says the "Iranian Cyber Army" site contained no malware, and it's very likely that Twitter's servers remained untouched in the attack. "It looks like they just hacked the registrar to redirect traffic," says Jones, who notes that Sophos sees a new Website compromise every 3.6 seconds.

Just how the hackers changed the DNS records for twitter.com remains a mystery. And apparently Twitter was just one site affected by the compromise. Trend Micro's Ferguson says he found via a search other Websites displaying the same content.

Gary Warner, director of research in computer forensics at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, blogged today that it appears the hosting company for the DNS servers, BlueHost, may have been compromised. "In my opinion, it looks like that server was compromised via WordPress vulnerabilities, but that is just an educated guess based on content at this time. So, it looks like the hacker first hacked one of the sites on the Bluehost box, other mowjcamp.org, wpcrowd.com, or coventryri.com, then redirected all the twitter traffic to that IP by changing the Nameserver entries for Twitter to point away from their normal Google-provided IP addresses to 66.147.242.88 instead," he blogged.

But Rod Rasmussen, president at Internet Identity, says his firm watched the attackers move the redirect from server to server several times, so it was not just BlueHost servers that were affected. Rasmussen says it appears the attackers had a user name and password for a DynDNS account, from which they changed the DNS record resolution for Twitter.

"On the face of it, it seems more like hacktivism. But it could be a cover for doing something more -- it's hard to tell," he says.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-6090
Published: 2015-04-27
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) DataMappingEditorCommands, (2) DatastoreEditorCommands, and (3) IEGEditorCommands servlets in IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 SP6 before EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.3 before 6.0.3.0 iFix8, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.5 iFix...

CVE-2014-6092
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM Curam Social Program Management (SPM) 5.2 before SP6 EP6, 6.0 SP2 before EP26, 6.0.4 before 6.0.4.6, and 6.0.5 before 6.0.5.6 requires failed-login handling for web-service accounts to have the same lockout policy as for standard user accounts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause...

CVE-2015-0113
Published: 2015-04-27
The Jazz help system in IBM Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management 4.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Quality Manager 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Team Concert 4.0 through 4.0.7 and 5.0 through 5.0.2, Rational Requirements Composer 4.0 through 4.0.7, Rational DOORS Next Generation...

CVE-2015-0174
Published: 2015-04-27
The SNMP implementation in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 before 8.5.5.5 does not properly handle configuration data, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-0175
Published: 2015-04-27
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 Liberty Profile before 8.5.5.5 does not properly implement authData elements, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join security and risk expert John Pironti and Dark Reading Editor-in-Chief Tim Wilson for a live online discussion of the sea-changing shift in security strategy and the many ways it is affecting IT and business.