Attacks/Breaches
6/11/2010
12:54 AM
100%
0%

The Truth About Vulnerability Scanners

Scanning tools can help detect vulnerabilities, but they shouldn't be the only tools on your belt. Here's a look at three areas where scanners fall short

Excerpted from "Scanning Reality: Limits of Automated Vulnerability Scanners," a new report posted today in Dark Reading's Vulnerability Management Tech Center.

In some enterprises, the term "vulnerability management" begins and ends with scanning tools. For these enterprises, improving vulnerability management simply means bringing in more scanners to ensure a broad view.

But are network-based vulnerability scanners and Web application scanning tools enough to ensure that your organization will identify and remediate its security vulnerabilities -- before they are exploited by the bad guys? We submit that most IT organizations have a limited understanding of what these tools can do -- and where they fall short.

There are three key limitations of vulnerability scanners. Some of the risks around these problems can be mitigated by incorporating additional technologies into your vulnerability management program, while others are beyond the scope of any automated technology.

Whatever mitigation strategy is used to fill the gap left by these scanners, the first step is to understand their shortcomings.

The first problem area is authentication. Network-based vulnerability scanners are imperfect tools at best. Even when they are properly configured, they detect only vulnerabilities for which they have signatures. While anonymous (unauthenticated) scanning can provide some benefit, failure to leverage authenticated scanning dramatically reduces scanner effectiveness.

A second key problem is the scanner's inability to work with custom applications. CVE-based, known vulnerabilities are only a small subset of most organizations' overall attack surfaces. Security checks may exist for the most popular applications and operating systems hosted within your network, but what about the custom applications you have written in-house or outsourced to third parties? There are no CVEs for custom apps.

Finally, most vulnerability scanning tools can identify points of weakness, but they can't anticipate complex attack schemes. While vulnerability scanners typically identify and report on issues that can be utilized as the initial point of entry, they are limited in identifying the complex avenues an attacker could take to compromise your network.

Automated vulnerability scanners play a critical role in helping you manage and understand the security risks that may exist within your environment. However, like any tool, the capabilities and results of these tools need to be fully understood and their limitations noted.

To get details on these key limitations, and some recommendations on how to address them, download the full report.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-4231
Published: 2015-07-03
The Python interpreter in Cisco NX-OS 6.2(8a) on Nexus 7000 devices allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and delete an arbitrary VDC's files by leveraging administrative privileges in one VDC, aka Bug ID CSCur08416.

CVE-2015-4232
Published: 2015-07-03
Cisco NX-OS 6.2(10) on Nexus and MDS 9000 devices allows local users to execute arbitrary OS commands by entering crafted tar parameters in the CLI, aka Bug ID CSCus44856.

CVE-2015-4234
Published: 2015-07-03
Cisco NX-OS 6.0(2) and 6.2(2) on Nexus devices has an improper OS configuration, which allows local users to obtain root access via unspecified input to the Python interpreter, aka Bug IDs CSCun02887, CSCur00115, and CSCur00127.

CVE-2015-4237
Published: 2015-07-03
The CLI parser in Cisco NX-OS 4.1(2)E1(1), 6.2(11b), 6.2(12), 7.2(0)ZZ(99.1), 7.2(0)ZZ(99.3), and 9.1(1)SV1(3.1.8) on Nexus devices allows local users to execute arbitrary OS commands via crafted characters in a filename, aka Bug IDs CSCuv08491, CSCuv08443, CSCuv08480, CSCuv08448, CSCuu99291, CSCuv0...

CVE-2015-4239
Published: 2015-07-03
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.3(2.243) and 100.13(0.21) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending crafted OSPFv2 packets on the local network, aka Bug ID CSCus84220.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Marc Spitler, co-author of the Verizon DBIR will share some of the lesser-known but most intriguing tidbits from the massive report